<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Form and Substance”</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2006/09/08/form-and-substance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2006/09/08/form-and-substance/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Perils of Providing for Entry into a Contract on &#8220;Customary&#8221; Terms</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2006/09/08/form-and-substance/comment-page-1/#comment-6529</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Perils of Providing for Entry into a Contract on &#8220;Customary&#8221; Terms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 14:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2006/09/08/form-and-substance/#comment-6529</guid>
		<description>[...] this September 2006 blog post I examined the phrase form and substance, as in &#8220;an opinion of counsel in form and substance [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this September 2006 blog post I examined the phrase form and substance, as in &#8220;an opinion of counsel in form and substance [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2006/09/08/form-and-substance/comment-page-1/#comment-423</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Sep 2006 23:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2006/09/08/form-and-substance/#comment-423</guid>
		<description>Why not just &quot;satisfactory to buyer&quot;? Whether the buyer relies on opinion of counsel is between the buyer and counsel. However, unless I am being paid by the hour, I prefer more specific requirements.

I frequently do engineering work in which the contract (or purchase order) requires that I deliver documents. My preference is that the documents delivered conform to some specific standard, legal requirement, or example. For example, a document may be required to be &quot;as required by 21 CFR xxxx&quot;, or &quot;in the specific format as the example document in exhibit A of this contract&quot;.

If a particular form (or format) is required, that requirement should be made clear in the contract by specification or by reference.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why not just &#8220;satisfactory to buyer&#8221;? Whether the buyer relies on opinion of counsel is between the buyer and counsel. However, unless I am being paid by the hour, I prefer more specific requirements.</p>
<p>I frequently do engineering work in which the contract (or purchase order) requires that I deliver documents. My preference is that the documents delivered conform to some specific standard, legal requirement, or example. For example, a document may be required to be &#8220;as required by 21 CFR xxxx&#8221;, or &#8220;in the specific format as the example document in exhibit A of this contract&#8221;.</p>
<p>If a particular form (or format) is required, that requirement should be made clear in the contract by specification or by reference.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

