<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;If They&#8217;ve Been Promoted, Why Should They Still Be Writing Contracts?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Australia: A Haven for Contract Drafters?</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-96111</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Australia: A Haven for Contract Drafters?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:08:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/#comment-96111</guid>
		<description>[...] to be that contract drafting is something you push as far down the food chain as possible. (See this March 2007 blog post for more about [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be that contract drafting is something you push as far down the food chain as possible. (See this March 2007 blog post for more about [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2757</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2007 18:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/#comment-2757</guid>
		<description>Mike: I agree that reviewing a contract can be as time consuming as drafting one. (How much you&#039;re required to do of each task will depend on the kind of business your company is in.) And the worse the drafting is, the more time consuming the review.

Cutting down the time spent on review is difficult but not impossible. Both sides would need to be familiar with the form used by whichever side is drafting. That already happens in some industries—witness the way the National Venture Capital Association&#039;s model documents have become widely used. I&#039;m hopeful that a source of a broader range of documents will appear on the scene in the not-too-distant future.

Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: I agree that reviewing a contract can be as time consuming as drafting one. (How much you&#8217;re required to do of each task will depend on the kind of business your company is in.) And the worse the drafting is, the more time consuming the review.</p>
<p>Cutting down the time spent on review is difficult but not impossible. Both sides would need to be familiar with the form used by whichever side is drafting. That already happens in some industries—witness the way the National Venture Capital Association&#8217;s model documents have become widely used. I&#8217;m hopeful that a source of a broader range of documents will appear on the scene in the not-too-distant future.</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2747</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 20:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/#comment-2747</guid>
		<description>As a client, I expect that a senior level lawyer will be involved in the drafting of contracts and other documents. That person may use a less experienced lawyer or para-legal to assist her. That is the lawyer&#039;s decision.

I expect that in many cases it is less costly for the experienced person to do the drafting rather than have one person do part and another do the rest.

But the main point is that the drafting of an important document is not an unimportant task that can be left to the less experienced (and cheaper) people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a client, I expect that a senior level lawyer will be involved in the drafting of contracts and other documents. That person may use a less experienced lawyer or para-legal to assist her. That is the lawyer&#8217;s decision.</p>
<p>I expect that in many cases it is less costly for the experienced person to do the drafting rather than have one person do part and another do the rest.</p>
<p>But the main point is that the drafting of an important document is not an unimportant task that can be left to the less experienced (and cheaper) people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/comment-page-1/#comment-2745</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 16:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/01/should-they-still-be-writing-contracts/#comment-2745</guid>
		<description>Something that NEVER gets mentioned in these discussions is contract review.  Sure document assembly simplifies the &quot;simple&quot; part of contract drafting, but that&#039;s hardly the end of it, usually.

More frequently that preparing a brand new agreement (or assembling an agreement), I&#039;m left reviewing someone else&#039;s work product for my client because they&#039;re not interested in reading the seventy-five page franchise/licensing agreement.

This means 1) spending a lot of time reading the agreement; 2) preparing tons of changes; 3) making the business terms fit; and 4) rinse and repeat.

I&#039;m not entirely sure what&#039;s more time consuming, initial draft work, or review.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Something that NEVER gets mentioned in these discussions is contract review.  Sure document assembly simplifies the &#8220;simple&#8221; part of contract drafting, but that&#8217;s hardly the end of it, usually.</p>
<p>More frequently that preparing a brand new agreement (or assembling an agreement), I&#8217;m left reviewing someone else&#8217;s work product for my client because they&#8217;re not interested in reading the seventy-five page franchise/licensing agreement.</p>
<p>This means 1) spending a lot of time reading the agreement; 2) preparing tons of changes; 3) making the business terms fit; and 4) rinse and repeat.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not entirely sure what&#8217;s more time consuming, initial draft work, or review.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

