<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Language to Use When Making an Ancillary Document Part of a Contract</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Not to Incorporate a Virtual Attachment, Part Deux</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-9834</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; How Not to Incorporate a Virtual Attachment, Part Deux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/#comment-9834</guid>
		<description>[...] this March 2007 post I discussed language to use, and language not to use, when making an ancillary document—including [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this March 2007 post I discussed language to use, and language not to use, when making an ancillary document—including [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unilaterally Amending &#8220;Virtual Attachments&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-6847</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Unilaterally Amending &#8220;Virtual Attachments&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jul 2007 20:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/#comment-6847</guid>
		<description>[...] this post I discussed language to use when incorporating into a contract terms stated in an ancillary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this post I discussed language to use when incorporating into a contract terms stated in an ancillary [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-4640</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 May 2007 20:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/#comment-4640</guid>
		<description>The May/June 2007 issue of Business Law Today contains, in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/blt/2007-05-06/keepingcurrent3.shtml&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Keeping Current: Contracts&lt;/a&gt;, a discussion of the &lt;em&gt;Affinity Internet&lt;/em&gt; case by Lisa Lifshitz, a Gowlings partner. Lisa regards this case as &quot;troubling,&quot; whereas I found it no big deal. Also, Lisa proposes that one use the formula &quot;incorporated herein and made part hereof,&quot; whereas in &lt;em&gt;MSCD&lt;/em&gt; and the above post I recommend you steer clear of using in a contract the phrase &lt;em&gt;incorporate by reference&lt;/em&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The May/June 2007 issue of Business Law Today contains, in <a href="http://www.abanet.org/buslaw/blt/2007-05-06/keepingcurrent3.shtml" rel="nofollow">Keeping Current: Contracts</a>, a discussion of the <em>Affinity Internet</em> case by Lisa Lifshitz, a Gowlings partner. Lisa regards this case as &#8220;troubling,&#8221; whereas I found it no big deal. Also, Lisa proposes that one use the formula &#8220;incorporated herein and made part hereof,&#8221; whereas in <em>MSCD</em> and the above post I recommend you steer clear of using in a contract the phrase <em>incorporate by reference</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-3008</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/#comment-3008</guid>
		<description>Lisa: A company should include a link in a contract only if it&#039;s prepared to be vigilant in combatting &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_rot&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link rot&lt;/a&gt;. Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lisa: A company should include a link in a contract only if it&#8217;s prepared to be vigilant in combatting <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Link_rot" rel="nofollow">link rot</a>. Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-3006</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 18:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/#comment-3006</guid>
		<description>What if the cited link no longer works?  Internet links often become dead, therefore I do not believe they are reliable to cite.

“The SkyNetWEB user agreement located at http://www.skynetweb.com/
company/legal/legal.php constitutes part of this agreement.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What if the cited link no longer works?  Internet links often become dead, therefore I do not believe they are reliable to cite.</p>
<p>“The SkyNetWEB user agreement located at <a href="http://www.skynetweb.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.skynetweb.com/</a><br />
company/legal/legal.php constitutes part of this agreement.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/comment-page-1/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 12:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/14/making-an-ancillary-document-part-of-a-contract/#comment-2874</guid>
		<description>You might find this 7th circuit opinion interesting: http://pub.bna.com/eclr/053743.pdf

It deals with UPS&#039; click-wrap agreement which incorporated a separate &quot;Terms and Conditions of Service&quot;.  The court mostly bypasses the issue and enforces a provision that said that UPS is not liable for shipping things in excess of $50k--the guy shipped a $105k piece of jewelry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might find this 7th circuit opinion interesting: <a href="http://pub.bna.com/eclr/053743.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://pub.bna.com/eclr/053743.pdf</a></p>
<p>It deals with UPS&#8217; click-wrap agreement which incorporated a separate &#8220;Terms and Conditions of Service&#8221;.  The court mostly bypasses the issue and enforces a provision that said that UPS is not liable for shipping things in excess of $50k&#8211;the guy shipped a $105k piece of jewelry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

