<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: English Case on &#8220;Best Endeavours&#8221; and &#8220;Reasonable Endeavours&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Håvard Hanto</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/comment-page-1/#comment-7564</link>
		<dc:creator>Håvard Hanto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 12:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/#comment-7564</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not entirely convinced by the rethirocal emphasis argument. For instance, &quot;proceed with appropriate caution&quot; does not necessarily convey the same meaning as &quot;proceed with extreme caution&quot; (although it might, see below).

However, if the aim is to make a party go above and beyond the call of duty, this should be achieved by stating the reason for making him do so, ie. why such a demand is reasonable. Above all this helps to clarify what is actualy expected from the parties, preventing dispute to arise in the first place. Also, in the event of dispute, it prevents the outcome from being dependent on the courts personal views on the reasonable/best debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not entirely convinced by the rethirocal emphasis argument. For instance, &#8220;proceed with appropriate caution&#8221; does not necessarily convey the same meaning as &#8220;proceed with extreme caution&#8221; (although it might, see below).</p>
<p>However, if the aim is to make a party go above and beyond the call of duty, this should be achieved by stating the reason for making him do so, ie. why such a demand is reasonable. Above all this helps to clarify what is actualy expected from the parties, preventing dispute to arise in the first place. Also, in the event of dispute, it prevents the outcome from being dependent on the courts personal views on the reasonable/best debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Revisiting the English Case on “Best Endeavours” and “Reasonable Endeavours”</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/comment-page-1/#comment-6211</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Revisiting the English Case on “Best Endeavours” and “Reasonable Endeavours”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 11:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/#comment-6211</guid>
		<description>[...] LLC, the recent English case on the meaning of best endeavours and reasonable endeavours. I did a blog post about this case, so I was interested to see what this author had to say. Here&#8217;s the relevant [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] LLC, the recent English case on the meaning of best endeavours and reasonable endeavours. I did a blog post about this case, so I was interested to see what this author had to say. Here&#8217;s the relevant [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/comment-page-1/#comment-3013</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/#comment-3013</guid>
		<description>JB: I recommend that you not attempt to draw a distinction between &lt;em&gt;reasonable endeavours&lt;/em&gt; and &lt;em&gt;all reasonable endeavours&lt;/em&gt;: that way lies madness.

The only question you need ask is whether &lt;em&gt;best endeavours&lt;/em&gt; represents a stricter standard that &lt;em&gt;reasonable endeavours&lt;/em&gt;. I have no hesitation saying that the two phrases mean that same thing. Coming to a different conclusion requires a tin ear, in terms of the semantics involved, and requires that you consider the question purely on a theoretical rather than a practical level.

I don&#039;t want to start repeating myself on this subject, so I&#039;ll just add the following example: John&#039;s mother is coming to London for a weekend on the town, and she wants to see &quot;Coriolanus.&quot; John tells her, &quot;I&#039;ll do my best to get tickets.&quot; He learns that the show is sold out. Does doing his best require that he purchase tickets from a scalper (or &quot;tout,&quot; for U.K. readers)? Does it require that he pay any price for the tickets, even fifty times the face value?

I suggest that we&#039;d only expect John to do what&#039;s reasonable in the context. And I suggest that the same approach applies when interpreting a &lt;em&gt;best endeavours&lt;/em&gt; standard in a contract.

Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JB: I recommend that you not attempt to draw a distinction between <em>reasonable endeavours</em> and <em>all reasonable endeavours</em>: that way lies madness.</p>
<p>The only question you need ask is whether <em>best endeavours</em> represents a stricter standard that <em>reasonable endeavours</em>. I have no hesitation saying that the two phrases mean that same thing. Coming to a different conclusion requires a tin ear, in terms of the semantics involved, and requires that you consider the question purely on a theoretical rather than a practical level.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to start repeating myself on this subject, so I&#8217;ll just add the following example: John&#8217;s mother is coming to London for a weekend on the town, and she wants to see &#8220;Coriolanus.&#8221; John tells her, &#8220;I&#8217;ll do my best to get tickets.&#8221; He learns that the show is sold out. Does doing his best require that he purchase tickets from a scalper (or &#8220;tout,&#8221; for U.K. readers)? Does it require that he pay any price for the tickets, even fifty times the face value?</p>
<p>I suggest that we&#8217;d only expect John to do what&#8217;s reasonable in the context. And I suggest that the same approach applies when interpreting a <em>best endeavours</em> standard in a contract.</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB Conner</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/comment-page-1/#comment-3009</link>
		<dc:creator>JB Conner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/#comment-3009</guid>
		<description>I won&#039;t comment on whether &quot;best efforts&quot; represents a higher standard than &quot;reasonable efforts.&quot;

However, I would like to point out what I see as the main problem with the reasoning presenting in the dictum, even conceding the point that there is a difference in the two standards.

The dictum defines &#039;best efforts&quot; as ALL reasonable efforts. Thus, holding a party to such standard would require not only that it choose and use the best of all reasonable endeavors, but that it use ALL reasonable endeavors.

This is potentially even more onerous than I would have imagined &quot;best efforts&quot; to require (if there is a distinction between &quot;best&quot; and &quot;reasonable&quot;).  I would have expected &quot;best efforts&quot; to require a party to determine and use the best endeavor among the reasonable set of endeavors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I won&#8217;t comment on whether &#8220;best efforts&#8221; represents a higher standard than &#8220;reasonable efforts.&#8221;</p>
<p>However, I would like to point out what I see as the main problem with the reasoning presenting in the dictum, even conceding the point that there is a difference in the two standards.</p>
<p>The dictum defines &#8216;best efforts&#8221; as ALL reasonable efforts. Thus, holding a party to such standard would require not only that it choose and use the best of all reasonable endeavors, but that it use ALL reasonable endeavors.</p>
<p>This is potentially even more onerous than I would have imagined &#8220;best efforts&#8221; to require (if there is a distinction between &#8220;best&#8221; and &#8220;reasonable&#8221;).  I would have expected &#8220;best efforts&#8221; to require a party to determine and use the best endeavor among the reasonable set of endeavors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More than reasonable? &#124; nearlylegal</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/comment-page-1/#comment-2997</link>
		<dc:creator>More than reasonable? &#124; nearlylegal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 19:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/#comment-2997</guid>
		<description>[...] pointed me to a piece on an English judgment on &#8216;best endeavours and reasonable endeavours&#8217;. Having read it, I agree that the terms of the distinction drawn by the Judge don&#8217;t hold [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] pointed me to a piece on an English judgment on &#8216;best endeavours and reasonable endeavours&#8217;. Having read it, I agree that the terms of the distinction drawn by the Judge don&#8217;t hold [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/comment-page-1/#comment-2966</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/#comment-2966</guid>
		<description>John: I wouldn&#039;t be inclined to limit a &lt;em&gt;reasonable efforts&lt;/em&gt; standard by tacking on &quot;in accordance with industry standard practice&quot; or anything similar. Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John: I wouldn&#8217;t be inclined to limit a <em>reasonable efforts</em> standard by tacking on &#8220;in accordance with industry standard practice&#8221; or anything similar. Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: john fitzpatrick</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/comment-page-1/#comment-2965</link>
		<dc:creator>john fitzpatrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/#comment-2965</guid>
		<description>I often find myself wrestling with an opposing who insists on &quot;commercially reasonable efforts&quot;.  Very similar to your reasoning, my usual line is that if you cannot give me a brightline explanation as to why this phrasing is different or better, let&#039;s be reasonable and choose &quot;reasonable efforts&quot;.  What is your opinion with regard to qualifying an efforts cluase with &quot;in accordance with industry standard practice&quot; or some such verbiage?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I often find myself wrestling with an opposing who insists on &#8220;commercially reasonable efforts&#8221;.  Very similar to your reasoning, my usual line is that if you cannot give me a brightline explanation as to why this phrasing is different or better, let&#8217;s be reasonable and choose &#8220;reasonable efforts&#8221;.  What is your opinion with regard to qualifying an efforts cluase with &#8220;in accordance with industry standard practice&#8221; or some such verbiage?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Goldman</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/comment-page-1/#comment-2964</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2007 20:16:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/03/21/english-case-best-reasonable-endeavours/#comment-2964</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve tried your last point many times.  Usually, the customer&#039;s response is: &quot;What, you&#039;re not going to give me your best???&quot;  It&#039;s always a sticky discussion with customers.  Eric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve tried your last point many times.  Usually, the customer&#8217;s response is: &#8220;What, you&#8217;re not going to give me your best???&#8221;  It&#8217;s always a sticky discussion with customers.  Eric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

