<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Half&#8221; or &#8220;50%&#8221;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/10/14/half-or-50-percent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/10/14/half-or-50-percent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/10/14/half-or-50-percent/comment-page-1/#comment-10321</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 13:04:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/10/14/half-or-50-percent/#comment-10321</guid>
		<description>Mike: I agree that if you&#039;re dealing with a provision containing other percentages, you&#039;re best off sticking with &lt;em&gt;50%&lt;/em&gt;. Same if you&#039;re dealing with financial figures. But I don&#039;t think that applies to the example in my post, &quot;50% of the shares.&quot; And would you say &quot;50% of the members of the Company&#039;s board of directors&quot;? Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: I agree that if you&#8217;re dealing with a provision containing other percentages, you&#8217;re best off sticking with <em>50%</em>. Same if you&#8217;re dealing with financial figures. But I don&#8217;t think that applies to the example in my post, &#8220;50% of the shares.&#8221; And would you say &#8220;50% of the members of the Company&#8217;s board of directors&#8221;? Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/10/14/half-or-50-percent/comment-page-1/#comment-10317</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 12:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/10/14/half-or-50-percent/#comment-10317</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d use 50% for two reasons. First, if I&#039;m using numbers elsewhere in the agreement, it would be a bit peculiar to flip to words for a single instance.

Second, I also find that numbers stick out better than the words anyway. So, for example, it&#039;s much easier to scan and find &quot;will pay 50% of gross sales&quot; than &quot;will pay half of gross sales.&quot; This means that the business folks can find the terms quickly, and it gives them reason to stop and take notice. But, maybe that&#039;s just me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d use 50% for two reasons. First, if I&#8217;m using numbers elsewhere in the agreement, it would be a bit peculiar to flip to words for a single instance.</p>
<p>Second, I also find that numbers stick out better than the words anyway. So, for example, it&#8217;s much easier to scan and find &#8220;will pay 50% of gross sales&#8221; than &#8220;will pay half of gross sales.&#8221; This means that the business folks can find the terms quickly, and it gives them reason to stop and take notice. But, maybe that&#8217;s just me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

