<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: docstoc? No Thanks!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/11/01/docstoc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/11/01/docstoc/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; With Free Online Forms, You Get What You Pay For</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/11/01/docstoc/comment-page-1/#comment-79094</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; With Free Online Forms, You Get What You Pay For</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:49:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/11/01/docstoc/#comment-79094</guid>
		<description>[...] is another docstoc. See this November 2007 post for my critique of docstoc. The problem isn&#8217;t a shortage of free legal forms online. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is another docstoc. See this November 2007 post for my critique of docstoc. The problem isn&#8217;t a shortage of free legal forms online. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Taking stock of docstoc : Binary Law</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/11/01/docstoc/comment-page-1/#comment-17232</link>
		<dc:creator>Taking stock of docstoc : Binary Law</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 14:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/11/01/docstoc/#comment-17232</guid>
		<description>[...] critique of docstocs by a lawyer I have so far found is from contract drafstmen and regular blogger Ken Adams: the rating feature seems beside the point, given the countless factors that would determine [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] critique of docstocs by a lawyer I have so far found is from contract drafstmen and regular blogger Ken Adams: the rating feature seems beside the point, given the countless factors that would determine [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason nazar</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/11/01/docstoc/comment-page-1/#comment-12799</link>
		<dc:creator>jason nazar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 08:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/11/01/docstoc/#comment-12799</guid>
		<description>You bring up good points.  We are certainly not a robust offering for attorneys at the moment.    

We&#039;re a community site to help folks find all kinds of professional content for free and to connect with other professionals.  

There are specific benefits for attorneys as well, including a keyword search (which indexes the content inside the document), which can help them find specific documents or verbage much more easily than on any other site.  

We&#039;ve had both very positive feedback and also some critique from attorneys.  If you have recommendations on how to make docstoc a better resource for our profession, I would appreciate it, and do my best to integrate that feedback.

Thankfully,

Jason Nazar, CEO Docstoc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You bring up good points.  We are certainly not a robust offering for attorneys at the moment.    </p>
<p>We&#8217;re a community site to help folks find all kinds of professional content for free and to connect with other professionals.  </p>
<p>There are specific benefits for attorneys as well, including a keyword search (which indexes the content inside the document), which can help them find specific documents or verbage much more easily than on any other site.  </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had both very positive feedback and also some critique from attorneys.  If you have recommendations on how to make docstoc a better resource for our profession, I would appreciate it, and do my best to integrate that feedback.</p>
<p>Thankfully,</p>
<p>Jason Nazar, CEO Docstoc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

