<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Report on the Penn Law 2007 Contract-Redrafting Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/06/penn-law-2007-redrafting-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/06/penn-law-2007-redrafting-project/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Report on the 2008 Penn Law Redrafting Project</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/06/penn-law-2007-redrafting-project/comment-page-1/#comment-72764</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Report on the 2008 Penn Law Redrafting Project</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 14:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/06/penn-law-2007-redrafting-project/#comment-72764</guid>
		<description>[...] post. The process this time around was the same as in previous semesters—for more on that, see this December 2007 post about the 2007 redrafting project. First I annotated their contract through the first four sections [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] post. The process this time around was the same as in previous semesters—for more on that, see this December 2007 post about the 2007 redrafting project. First I annotated their contract through the first four sections [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; At Least We&#8217;re Not the Only Ones Who Are Grossly Inefficient</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/06/penn-law-2007-redrafting-project/comment-page-1/#comment-23991</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; At Least We&#8217;re Not the Only Ones Who Are Grossly Inefficient</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 06:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/06/penn-law-2007-redrafting-project/#comment-23991</guid>
		<description>[...] to be made in terms of quality are dramatic. I routinely witness this myself, most recently in my Penn Law redrafting project. The same effect is on display in the materials I prepared for a panel discussion at the 2007 ABA [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to be made in terms of quality are dramatic. I routinely witness this myself, most recently in my Penn Law redrafting project. The same effect is on display in the materials I prepared for a panel discussion at the 2007 ABA [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sol Irvine</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/06/penn-law-2007-redrafting-project/comment-page-1/#comment-22685</link>
		<dc:creator>Sol Irvine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/06/penn-law-2007-redrafting-project/#comment-22685</guid>
		<description>Ken,

This is the kind of thing that I wish would happen more at big law firms, but very rarely does.  In my own practice, I have been lucky enough to have a few clients hire us to overhaul their template library.  This is always the most interesting kind of assignment for practitioners, and my experience is that clients more readily appreciate the tangible &quot;savings&quot; from such an exercise than they might in ordinary deal activity.

Any chance we can see a redacted version of the drafts?  I would love to have the benefit of these annotations.

Sol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,</p>
<p>This is the kind of thing that I wish would happen more at big law firms, but very rarely does.  In my own practice, I have been lucky enough to have a few clients hire us to overhaul their template library.  This is always the most interesting kind of assignment for practitioners, and my experience is that clients more readily appreciate the tangible &#8220;savings&#8221; from such an exercise than they might in ordinary deal activity.</p>
<p>Any chance we can see a redacted version of the drafts?  I would love to have the benefit of these annotations.</p>
<p>Sol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

