<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And I&#8217;m Getting Rid of Underlining, Too</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/comment-page-1/#comment-47595</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2008 20:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/#comment-47595</guid>
		<description>Most firms use Deltaview to compare different new and old versions of documents.  Since most Deltaview comparisons shows changes as underlined, any underlined text will confuse readers (or will not show up in changed text).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most firms use Deltaview to compare different new and old versions of documents.  Since most Deltaview comparisons shows changes as underlined, any underlined text will confuse readers (or will not show up in changed text).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/comment-page-1/#comment-24949</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/#comment-24949</guid>
		<description>Mike: Regarding bold being too heavy, you&#039;re where I was until very recently. I really don&#039;t have a problem with bold Calibri.

Although this discussion should be taking place in my typeface post, your comment on how new Calibri is suggests that—gasp!—you might not understand how it works. Leaving aside the Mac issue, if the receipient has Office 2007 or has downloaded the compatibility pack, when they open a document in Calibri, it would display in Calibri. If the recipient hasn&#039;t downloaded the compatability pack, Windows would initiate the processt that, in a few clicks, would result in its being download.

Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: Regarding bold being too heavy, you&#8217;re where I was until very recently. I really don&#8217;t have a problem with bold Calibri.</p>
<p>Although this discussion should be taking place in my typeface post, your comment on how new Calibri is suggests that—gasp!—you might not understand how it works. Leaving aside the Mac issue, if the receipient has Office 2007 or has downloaded the compatibility pack, when they open a document in Calibri, it would display in Calibri. If the recipient hasn&#8217;t downloaded the compatability pack, Windows would initiate the processt that, in a few clicks, would result in its being download.</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Halloran</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/comment-page-1/#comment-24945</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Halloran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 18:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/#comment-24945</guid>
		<description>I think another good reason to avoid underlining text is to avoid confusion with hyperlinks.  (Most web browsers underline hyperlinked text by default.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think another good reason to avoid underlining text is to avoid confusion with hyperlinks.  (Most web browsers underline hyperlinked text by default.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/comment-page-1/#comment-24938</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 17:36:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/#comment-24938</guid>
		<description>I prefer bold, italicized, underscored text. Delicious.

I agree that underscoring, and in particular underscoring with some fonts at small sizes, really decreases readability. However, I&#039;m not convinced switching to bolding will work in practice. It&#039;s just too heavy.

Also, given the newness of Calibri (office 2007), I can&#039;t imagine that most people would have it installed by default. So, you&#039;ll end up sending a draft, it&#039;ll show up in times new roman bolds.

Though, one solution to this issue is to use styles so that when the draft is sent for execution, you can switch to your preferred emphasizing/font by making a couple changes to the styling.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer bold, italicized, underscored text. Delicious.</p>
<p>I agree that underscoring, and in particular underscoring with some fonts at small sizes, really decreases readability. However, I&#8217;m not convinced switching to bolding will work in practice. It&#8217;s just too heavy.</p>
<p>Also, given the newness of Calibri (office 2007), I can&#8217;t imagine that most people would have it installed by default. So, you&#8217;ll end up sending a draft, it&#8217;ll show up in times new roman bolds.</p>
<p>Though, one solution to this issue is to use styles so that when the draft is sent for execution, you can switch to your preferred emphasizing/font by making a couple changes to the styling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellen Lupton</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/comment-page-1/#comment-24868</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellen Lupton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Dec 2007 13:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2007/12/20/getting-rid-of-underlining/#comment-24868</guid>
		<description>Underscoring is awful, truly awful. If you are working in a page layout program such as InDesign, you can adjust underscoring to fit your exact needs, but this is labor-intensive at best. Out-of-the-box underscoring is a fright. Bold is a nice alternative, especially if the contrast is not too great, as Kenneth suggests in his post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Underscoring is awful, truly awful. If you are working in a page layout program such as InDesign, you can adjust underscoring to fit your exact needs, but this is labor-intensive at best. Out-of-the-box underscoring is a fright. Bold is a nice alternative, especially if the contrast is not too great, as Kenneth suggests in his post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

