<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quanta v. LG—Chief Justice Roberts on the &#8220;Let&#8217;s Sort It Out in Litigation&#8221; Approach</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/01/18/quanta/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/01/18/quanta/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/01/18/quanta/comment-page-1/#comment-32313</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 20:26:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/01/18/quanta/#comment-32313</guid>
		<description>Ken&#039;s comment is a very interesting one and it goes to the heart of some of my daily frustrations.  How are you supposed to effectively manage risk through contracts when the cost-benefit analysis always goes against you?

Not that there&#039;s any real analysis that goes on here, it&#039;s just a matter of &quot;if we&#039;re going to make money, we&#039;re going to go ahead regardless of what Mike says&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken&#8217;s comment is a very interesting one and it goes to the heart of some of my daily frustrations.  How are you supposed to effectively manage risk through contracts when the cost-benefit analysis always goes against you?</p>
<p>Not that there&#8217;s any real analysis that goes on here, it&#8217;s just a matter of &#8220;if we&#8217;re going to make money, we&#8217;re going to go ahead regardless of what Mike says&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. C. Toedt</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/01/18/quanta/comment-page-1/#comment-31337</link>
		<dc:creator>D. C. Toedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:49:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/01/18/quanta/#comment-31337</guid>
		<description>&quot;Of course, whether it’s best to tackle an issue head-on or take your chances on the possibility of litigation requires in each case a cost-benefit analysis.&quot;

Yup. Business people frequently would much rather get the ink on the signature line and gamble that the contract will never go to court. Percentage-wise, often that&#039;s not a bad bet. A lot of outside counsel don&#039;t realize that (I used to be one of them).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Of course, whether it’s best to tackle an issue head-on or take your chances on the possibility of litigation requires in each case a cost-benefit analysis.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yup. Business people frequently would much rather get the ink on the signature line and gamble that the contract will never go to court. Percentage-wise, often that&#8217;s not a bad bet. A lot of outside counsel don&#8217;t realize that (I used to be one of them).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

