<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Complete and Accurate&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/02/23/complete-and-accurate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/02/23/complete-and-accurate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: 10803</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/02/23/complete-and-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-43685</link>
		<dc:creator>10803</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/02/23/complete-and-accurate/#comment-43685</guid>
		<description>I also think you&#039;re giving parties too much credit.  I have no doubt that the first response I would get from the database vendor is &quot;hey, every entry in that database is accurate, it&#039;s not my fault something is missing.&quot;  Sure, I might win at trial, but that&#039;s not the goal of a contract, or at least not my goal anyway.  My goal is to preempt as many disputes as possible and I don&#039;t think being (arguably) technically right on this point is going to further the goal of getting a complete and accurate database without fighting about whether it was complete (with errors) or accurate (with omissions).  

Also, the two concepts go hand-in-hand in other contexts... Think about 10(b)(5) liability.  The securities laws care not only that everything you&#039;ve said is accurate but that you also haven&#039;t failed to disclose anything that would be material (i.e., accurate and complete).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also think you&#8217;re giving parties too much credit.  I have no doubt that the first response I would get from the database vendor is &#8220;hey, every entry in that database is accurate, it&#8217;s not my fault something is missing.&#8221;  Sure, I might win at trial, but that&#8217;s not the goal of a contract, or at least not my goal anyway.  My goal is to preempt as many disputes as possible and I don&#8217;t think being (arguably) technically right on this point is going to further the goal of getting a complete and accurate database without fighting about whether it was complete (with errors) or accurate (with omissions).  </p>
<p>Also, the two concepts go hand-in-hand in other contexts&#8230; Think about 10(b)(5) liability.  The securities laws care not only that everything you&#8217;ve said is accurate but that you also haven&#8217;t failed to disclose anything that would be material (i.e., accurate and complete).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. C. Toedt</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/02/23/complete-and-accurate/comment-page-1/#comment-43520</link>
		<dc:creator>D. C. Toedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:28:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/02/23/complete-and-accurate/#comment-43520</guid>
		<description>&gt; &lt;em&gt;When you consider in isolation a given set of data, it’s inconceivable that it could be accurate yet incomplete.&lt;/em&gt;

At first I thought &quot;that makes sense,&quot; but on further reflection I&#039;m not sure &lt;em&gt;accurate&lt;/em&gt; is generally understood to encompass &lt;em&gt;complete&lt;/em&gt;.  Remember the old joke about the balloonist lost in the fog who descends to near-ground level and hollers down to a pedestrian, &quot;where am I?&quot; whereupon the pedestrian shouts back &quot;You&#039;re in a balloon.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt; <em>When you consider in isolation a given set of data, it’s inconceivable that it could be accurate yet incomplete.</em></p>
<p>At first I thought &#8220;that makes sense,&#8221; but on further reflection I&#8217;m not sure <em>accurate</em> is generally understood to encompass <em>complete</em>.  Remember the old joke about the balloonist lost in the fog who descends to near-ground level and hollers down to a pedestrian, &#8220;where am I?&#8221; whereupon the pedestrian shouts back &#8220;You&#8217;re in a balloon.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

