<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sources of Uncertainty in Contract Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 19:08:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Expert Testimony and Ambiguity</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-92274</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Expert Testimony and Ambiguity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 23:19:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/#comment-92274</guid>
		<description>[...] can be attributed to various sources, only one of them being ambiguity; see MSCD chapter 6 and this blog post. As compared with ambiguity, the other sources of uncertainty—undue generality, inconsistency, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] can be attributed to various sources, only one of them being ambiguity; see MSCD chapter 6 and this blog post. As compared with ambiguity, the other sources of uncertainty—undue generality, inconsistency, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Latent Ambiguity&#8221; Is a Confusing Concept</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-84226</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;Latent Ambiguity&#8221; Is a Confusing Concept</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:57:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/#comment-84226</guid>
		<description>[...] 6 of MSCD and this March 2008 blog post discuss generally how courts see ambiguity in all sources of uncertainty in contract [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 6 of MSCD and this March 2008 blog post discuss generally how courts see ambiguity in all sources of uncertainty in contract [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Addressing All Eventualities in Contract Procedures</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-83386</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Addressing All Eventualities in Contract Procedures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/#comment-83386</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;ambiguous&#8221; too loosely. That&#8217;s something I discuss in chapter 6 of MSCD and in this March 2008 blog post. To my mind, the language at issue wasn&#8217;t ambiguous—it was just insufficiently [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;ambiguous&#8221; too loosely. That&#8217;s something I discuss in chapter 6 of MSCD and in this March 2008 blog post. To my mind, the language at issue wasn&#8217;t ambiguous—it was just insufficiently [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cearta.ie » Interpreting Contracts</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-82908</link>
		<dc:creator>cearta.ie » Interpreting Contracts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:41:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/#comment-82908</guid>
		<description>[...] is concerned, the background is not admissible in its own terms but because it helps to resolve an uncertainty or ambiguity. However, the trend of the cases (see the speeches of Lord Wilberforce in Prenn v Simmonds [1971] 1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is concerned, the background is not admissible in its own terms but because it helps to resolve an uncertainty or ambiguity. However, the trend of the cases (see the speeches of Lord Wilberforce in Prenn v Simmonds [1971] 1 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-47233</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/#comment-47233</guid>
		<description>Wayne: I think I&#039;m done with writing law-review articles, but you shouldn&#039;t be surprised if a version of this appears in a periodical aimed at judges. Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wayne: I think I&#8217;m done with writing law-review articles, but you shouldn&#8217;t be surprised if a version of this appears in a periodical aimed at judges. Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne Schiess</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/comment-page-1/#comment-47227</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne Schiess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 16:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/03/04/sources-of-uncertainty/#comment-47227</guid>
		<description>Ken,
I like this essay very much. There is a law-review article here.

You are absolutely right that &quot;ambiguous&quot; is applied to almost any uncertainty in legal drafting. Careful writers and scholars should be more careful. And although we can almost guarantee that judges will not take heed, you should write an article about this.

-Wayne</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken,<br />
I like this essay very much. There is a law-review article here.</p>
<p>You are absolutely right that &#8220;ambiguous&#8221; is applied to almost any uncertainty in legal drafting. Careful writers and scholars should be more careful. And although we can almost guarantee that judges will not take heed, you should write an article about this.</p>
<p>-Wayne</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
