<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lexicon—A Tool for Organizing and Checking Defined Terms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/04/23/lexicon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/04/23/lexicon/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Gullion</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/04/23/lexicon/comment-page-1/#comment-50881</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Gullion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/04/23/lexicon/#comment-50881</guid>
		<description>Chris-

Thanks for trying Lexicon. You might like to know that you can add any terms you want (like &quot;law&quot; or &quot;shall&quot;) directly to the glossary rather than artificially inserting them in your document. Just click the Edit Glossary button or check the help file for instructions.

- Steve Gullion, Lexicon Tools</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris-</p>
<p>Thanks for trying Lexicon. You might like to know that you can add any terms you want (like &#8220;law&#8221; or &#8220;shall&#8221;) directly to the glossary rather than artificially inserting them in your document. Just click the Edit Glossary button or check the help file for instructions.</p>
<p>- Steve Gullion, Lexicon Tools</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lemens</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/04/23/lexicon/comment-page-1/#comment-50809</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lemens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 18:34:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/04/23/lexicon/#comment-50809</guid>
		<description>Ken:

I tried it. It seems kinda handy. I ran two form agreements through it and it found a few drafting busts. None were terribly significant in the sense that I could see litigation coming from them, but you never know.

More interestingly, it let me compare instances where I used the same word with different meanings and also in a defined sense. I had previously eliminated the defined term &quot;Law&quot; but had not killed off all its uses in text. Lexicon searched for instances of &quot;Law&quot; and also showed up all its non-capitalized forms -- &quot;law,&quot; &quot;the law,&quot; &quot;any law,&quot; and &quot;laws.&quot; All of these have different meanings, but I found one where I had said &quot;any law&quot; when I meant &quot;law&quot; and another where I had said &quot;laws&quot; when I mean &quot;law.&quot; To check all of these contrary meanings in the future, all I would have to do is type &quot;Law&quot; somewhere in the document (say, at the end) and it would show all of those uses for me and I could check for consistency.

I am thinking that, if I come up with a init-capitalized list of words that I always want to check for consistency, I could just paste it into the end of the document and then run Lexicon against it. For those that use the word &quot;shall,&quot; that might oughta be at the top of the list.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken:</p>
<p>I tried it. It seems kinda handy. I ran two form agreements through it and it found a few drafting busts. None were terribly significant in the sense that I could see litigation coming from them, but you never know.</p>
<p>More interestingly, it let me compare instances where I used the same word with different meanings and also in a defined sense. I had previously eliminated the defined term &#8220;Law&#8221; but had not killed off all its uses in text. Lexicon searched for instances of &#8220;Law&#8221; and also showed up all its non-capitalized forms &#8212; &#8220;law,&#8221; &#8220;the law,&#8221; &#8220;any law,&#8221; and &#8220;laws.&#8221; All of these have different meanings, but I found one where I had said &#8220;any law&#8221; when I meant &#8220;law&#8221; and another where I had said &#8220;laws&#8221; when I mean &#8220;law.&#8221; To check all of these contrary meanings in the future, all I would have to do is type &#8220;Law&#8221; somewhere in the document (say, at the end) and it would show all of those uses for me and I could check for consistency.</p>
<p>I am thinking that, if I come up with a init-capitalized list of words that I always want to check for consistency, I could just paste it into the end of the document and then run Lexicon against it. For those that use the word &#8220;shall,&#8221; that might oughta be at the top of the list.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Shea</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/04/23/lexicon/comment-page-1/#comment-50707</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Shea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/04/23/lexicon/#comment-50707</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up.  It&#039;s just too bad (for me, anyway) that Lexicon doesn&#039;t run on Mac OS X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up.  It&#8217;s just too bad (for me, anyway) that Lexicon doesn&#8217;t run on Mac OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

