May 8, 2008 Fall 2008 Penn Law Contract-Redrafting Project—Now Accepting Submissions!

It’s that time again: I’m looking for a company that would be interested in taking part in a contract-redrafting project with my class at the University of Pennsylvania Law School.

The idea is that I’ll select one contract out of those submitted by June 15. In the fall 2008 semester my class will redraft all or part of it, and sometime in December we’ll have a conference call with company personnel to discuss our changes. I explain in detail in this March 2007 post how the process works and why I think it’s valuable for my students and, one hopes, the company involved. And in this December 2007 post I discuss how the fall 2007 redrafting project went.

Regarding who might be a suitable candidate, this is what my March 2007 posts says:

So I’m looking for a substantial company (located in the U.S. or elsewhere) that’s interested in having me and my class redraft a core contract that the company enters into dozens or hundreds of times a year. (We’d redraft all of a shortish contract or the first part of a longer contract.) I’d want the company to have been planning its own redraft: I’d prefer to have our work looked at closely rather than considered a curiosity. Ideally, senior members of the company’s contracts personnel would be involved and would participate in a conference call (or videoconference) with my students. And I wouldn’t want anyone to be offended if we were to come back with something that’s significantly different from what we had started with.

Last year we selected a contract submitted by a major financial institution.

This project does require a commitment by the company. I have in mind that we’ll be providing the company with not only a redraft, but also a copy of the original contract extensively annotated to describe its drafting shortcomings. It’s essential that before our conference call the company considers our annotations closely and consults any sections of MSCD referred to.

If you’re interested in discussing with me whether your company would be a suitable candidate for this redrafting exercise, please send me an email.

Bookmark and Share

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

3 Comments to “Fall 2008 Penn Law Contract-Redrafting Project—Now Accepting Submissions!”

  1. Watching Your Language to Say What You Mean in Contracts « Ohio Practical Business Law Counsel says:

    [...] Choosing the Right Words.  All right >> so you’re convinced that using just the right language is important in any document dealing with a legal relationship.  But does that really mean it has to be long and virtually impossible to understand (even by another lawyer, or for that matter even a few years later by the lawyer who drafted it in the first place)?  Ken Adams, a professor at the University of Pennsylvania Law School who writes the terrific AdamsDrafting blog focusing on contract drafting, doesn’t think so.  He is seeking submissions of a form contract a company uses on a regular basis for his class to redraft.   [...]

  2. AdamsDrafting » Blog Archive » Defined Terms for the Components of a Transaction says:

    [...] That led to one of my students sending me the following message regarding our final assignment, the Penn Law redrafting project: Dear Professor [...]

  3. AdamsDrafting » Blog Archive » Report on the 2008 Penn Law Redrafting Project says:

    [...] I selected a template master services agreement submitted by a Fortune 500 company in response to this May 2008 post. The process this time around was the same as in previous semesters—for more on that, see this [...]

Post a comment