<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Including &#8220;And&#8221; or &#8220;Or&#8221; in a Tabulated List</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/10/13/and-or-tabulated-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/10/13/and-or-tabulated-list/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Brashear</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/10/13/and-or-tabulated-list/comment-page-1/#comment-67588</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Brashear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 14:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/10/13/and-or-tabulated-list/#comment-67588</guid>
		<description>The ambiguity in the example also could have been avoided by changing the lead-in clause to say something like &quot;those health services and supplies that are all of the following&quot; or &quot;those health services and supplies that meet all of the following requirements.&quot;  &lt;em&gt;[I noted this in my post—KAA.]&lt;/em&gt; This approach has the advantage of allowing the drafter to specify as to a following list whether &quot;all&quot; of the requirements must be met, or &quot;any&quot; of them, or &quot;any 2&quot; of them, etc.

Regarding the use of &quot;and&quot; in a list, I&#039;ve seen the opposite extreme on many occasions - the &quot;Lawrence Welk&quot; school of drafting, which inserts &quot;and&quot; in between every paragraph of a list (e.g., 1, and 2, and 3). I&#039;ve also seen similar usage of &quot;or&quot; in a disjunctive list. I think the practice is unnecessary but harmless - unless the list mixes the conjunctions (&quot;and&quot; with &quot;or&quot;) without further clarification (e.g., 1, and 2, or 3, and 4).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The ambiguity in the example also could have been avoided by changing the lead-in clause to say something like &#8220;those health services and supplies that are all of the following&#8221; or &#8220;those health services and supplies that meet all of the following requirements.&#8221;  <em>[I noted this in my post—KAA.]</em> This approach has the advantage of allowing the drafter to specify as to a following list whether &#8220;all&#8221; of the requirements must be met, or &#8220;any&#8221; of them, or &#8220;any 2&#8243; of them, etc.</p>
<p>Regarding the use of &#8220;and&#8221; in a list, I&#8217;ve seen the opposite extreme on many occasions &#8211; the &#8220;Lawrence Welk&#8221; school of drafting, which inserts &#8220;and&#8221; in between every paragraph of a list (e.g., 1, and 2, and 3). I&#8217;ve also seen similar usage of &#8220;or&#8221; in a disjunctive list. I think the practice is unnecessary but harmless &#8211; unless the list mixes the conjunctions (&#8220;and&#8221; with &#8220;or&#8221;) without further clarification (e.g., 1, and 2, or 3, and 4).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Lemens</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/10/13/and-or-tabulated-list/comment-page-1/#comment-67532</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Lemens</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:30:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/10/13/and-or-tabulated-list/#comment-67532</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been was working on a deal with a large insurance company, who is our customer. They drafted the paperwork, and don&#039;t like making changes to their documents. In the last draft, there was a lot of substantive stuff we needed, so I had left their formatting alone, so as not to create issues. Today, I was writing a note to my boss with recommendations.

I had to reference the nineteenth bullet point in a section. I&#039;d lay odds that he had to count several times.

Chris</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been was working on a deal with a large insurance company, who is our customer. They drafted the paperwork, and don&#8217;t like making changes to their documents. In the last draft, there was a lot of substantive stuff we needed, so I had left their formatting alone, so as not to create issues. Today, I was writing a note to my boss with recommendations.</p>
<p>I had to reference the nineteenth bullet point in a section. I&#8217;d lay odds that he had to count several times.</p>
<p>Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. C. Toedt</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/10/13/and-or-tabulated-list/comment-page-1/#comment-67529</link>
		<dc:creator>D. C. Toedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 02:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/10/13/and-or-tabulated-list/#comment-67529</guid>
		<description>The &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; might have been omitted by automated drafting software that didn&#039;t &#039;know&#039; which was the last item in the list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <em>and</em> might have been omitted by automated drafting software that didn&#8217;t &#8216;know&#8217; which was the last item in the list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

