<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Don&#8217;t Use &#8220;Immediately&#8221; for Things that Happen Automatically</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/11/30/immediately-automatically/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/11/30/immediately-automatically/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damon Daniels</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/11/30/immediately-automatically/comment-page-1/#comment-73369</link>
		<dc:creator>Damon Daniels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 21:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/11/30/immediately-automatically/#comment-73369</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen &quot;immediately&quot; in cases where the distinction is made between termination events with a cure period and those without.  I agree that it&#039;s probably overkill, but it has never troubled me, mainly because I can&#039;t see the argument that &quot;immediately&quot; implies any passage of time.  In fact, standard definitions of the word suggest that no time should be deemed to pass.  Ken, I always value your opinions, but I don&#039;t see your logic in this case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen &#8220;immediately&#8221; in cases where the distinction is made between termination events with a cure period and those without.  I agree that it&#8217;s probably overkill, but it has never troubled me, mainly because I can&#8217;t see the argument that &#8220;immediately&#8221; implies any passage of time.  In fact, standard definitions of the word suggest that no time should be deemed to pass.  Ken, I always value your opinions, but I don&#8217;t see your logic in this case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/11/30/immediately-automatically/comment-page-1/#comment-72359</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 19:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/11/30/immediately-automatically/#comment-72359</guid>
		<description>Michael: For my take on &lt;em&gt;automatically&lt;/em&gt;, see &lt;em&gt;MSCD&lt;/em&gt; 12.22. I concur with your approach. Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: For my take on <em>automatically</em>, see <em>MSCD</em> 12.22. I concur with your approach. Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Fleming</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/11/30/immediately-automatically/comment-page-1/#comment-72335</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Fleming</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/11/30/immediately-automatically/#comment-72335</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure I&#039;m advocating the idea (in fact I believe I would not if pressed), but what does the collective think about substituting &#039;automatically&#039; for the stricken &#039;immediately&#039; in the above example? 

The only time I might want to use it is in a negotiation with an inveterate adverbizer, on the ground that adding &#039;automatically&#039; won&#039;t do any harm other than to my sense of &#039;shorter is better.&#039; (I agree with Ken&#039;s unstated presumption that &#039;automatically&#039; is redundant in the context above.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I&#8217;m advocating the idea (in fact I believe I would not if pressed), but what does the collective think about substituting &#8216;automatically&#8217; for the stricken &#8216;immediately&#8217; in the above example? </p>
<p>The only time I might want to use it is in a negotiation with an inveterate adverbizer, on the ground that adding &#8216;automatically&#8217; won&#8217;t do any harm other than to my sense of &#8216;shorter is better.&#8217; (I agree with Ken&#8217;s unstated presumption that &#8216;automatically&#8217; is redundant in the context above.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

