<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Report on the 2008 Penn Law Redrafting Project</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/12/04/report-2008-penn-redrafting-project/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/12/04/report-2008-penn-redrafting-project/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;The Vendor&#8221; or &#8220;Vendor&#8221;—A Practical Consideration</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/12/04/report-2008-penn-redrafting-project/comment-page-1/#comment-72871</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; &#8220;The Vendor&#8221; or &#8220;Vendor&#8221;—A Practical Consideration</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Dec 2008 14:03:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2008/12/04/report-2008-penn-redrafting-project/#comment-72871</guid>
		<description>[...] our conference call about the 2008 Penn Law redrafting project (see this blog post), the company lawyers noted that I had elected to refer to the other party as the Vendor rather [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] our conference call about the 2008 Penn Law redrafting project (see this blog post), the company lawyers noted that I had elected to refer to the other party as the Vendor rather [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

