<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Using Parentheses Instead of &#8220;Respectively&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/01/06/parentheses-instead-of-respectively/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/01/06/parentheses-instead-of-respectively/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/01/06/parentheses-instead-of-respectively/comment-page-1/#comment-77127</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:42:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/01/06/parentheses-instead-of-respectively/#comment-77127</guid>
		<description>J.F.: Thank you for those suggestions. Of course, they have no bearing on the point I make in this post. Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>J.F.: Thank you for those suggestions. Of course, they have no bearing on the point I make in this post. Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.F.Reeh Taylor, Q.C.</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/01/06/parentheses-instead-of-respectively/comment-page-1/#comment-77122</link>
		<dc:creator>J.F.Reeh Taylor, Q.C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 16:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/01/06/parentheses-instead-of-respectively/#comment-77122</guid>
		<description>In the interests of brevity and avoiding redundancy, would your &#039;new and improved&#039; version not be better if you said &quot;....pay to the Vendor.....the amounts, if any,...&quot;, thus avoiding the duplicate &#039;any&#039;in lines 3/4 and 7/8?

Perhaps, also, one might say &quot;each applicable Acme Entity&quot; where the words &quot;the applicable one or more Acme Entities&quot; appear twice in the present draft?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the interests of brevity and avoiding redundancy, would your &#8216;new and improved&#8217; version not be better if you said &#8220;&#8230;.pay to the Vendor&#8230;..the amounts, if any,&#8230;&#8221;, thus avoiding the duplicate &#8216;any&#8217;in lines 3/4 and 7/8?</p>
<p>Perhaps, also, one might say &#8220;each applicable Acme Entity&#8221; where the words &#8220;the applicable one or more Acme Entities&#8221; appear twice in the present draft?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. C. Toedt</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/01/06/parentheses-instead-of-respectively/comment-page-1/#comment-77109</link>
		<dc:creator>D. C. Toedt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 15:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/01/06/parentheses-instead-of-respectively/#comment-77109</guid>
		<description>The parentheses are much better, IMHO. They let you quickly find the parallels between the agreement and the SoW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The parentheses are much better, IMHO. They let you quickly find the parallels between the agreement and the SoW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

