http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/02/06/using-any-to-tame-and/ Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=abc http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/02/06/using-any-to-tame-and/comment-page-1/#comment-80898 Ken Adams Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:55:55 +0000 http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/02/06/using-any-to-tame-and/#comment-80898 Kelly: Great point: the court's analysis was expedient in this case but may well come back to haunt them. Ken Kelly: Great point: the court’s analysis was expedient in this case but may well come back to haunt them. Ken

]]> http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/02/06/using-any-to-tame-and/comment-page-1/#comment-80897 kdtalcott Fri, 06 Feb 2009 13:51:19 +0000 http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/02/06/using-any-to-tame-and/#comment-80897 So it would seem that under the interpretation adopted by the Illinois Supreme Court, the Union is no longer required to submit evidence of dues deduction authorization if it can submit "other evidence" -- a result that really seems at odds with what appears to be what was intended. So it would seem that under the interpretation adopted by the Illinois Supreme Court, the Union is no longer required to submit evidence of dues deduction authorization if it can submit “other evidence” — a result that really seems at odds with what appears to be what was intended.

]]>