<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My NYLJ Article on Retooling Your Contract Process for the Downturn</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/02/18/article-retooling-your-contract-process/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/02/18/article-retooling-your-contract-process/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 18:00:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/02/18/article-retooling-your-contract-process/comment-page-1/#comment-83297</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 00:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/02/18/article-retooling-your-contract-process/#comment-83297</guid>
		<description>I appreciated your article.  The section entitled &quot;Decisions on Redrafting&quot; was particularly interesting to me.  Every year I send about 20 law student externs to the legal departments of large corporations.

One of their assignments is to revise a corporate document so it is more readable.  The students specifically ask their supervisors for a document the department would like redrafted. They take on this task after a half-day &quot;Readability Workshop&quot; (I don&#039;t call it plain English anymore) and the required purchase of Garner&#039;s &quot;Legal Writing in Plain English.&quot; Some of the students meet with me for hours to review their work product.  Most of the students do a professional job on this assignment.  

One might think this resource—law students with writing-for-readability training—could be a way for legal departments to redraft documents cost-effectively.

That probably won&#039;t happen, though, as the student work is rejected in favor of the original document at least 90% of the time. Those originals, apparently in hindsight, &quot;ain&#039;t broke.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I appreciated your article.  The section entitled &#8220;Decisions on Redrafting&#8221; was particularly interesting to me.  Every year I send about 20 law student externs to the legal departments of large corporations.</p>
<p>One of their assignments is to revise a corporate document so it is more readable.  The students specifically ask their supervisors for a document the department would like redrafted. They take on this task after a half-day &#8220;Readability Workshop&#8221; (I don&#8217;t call it plain English anymore) and the required purchase of Garner&#8217;s &#8220;Legal Writing in Plain English.&#8221; Some of the students meet with me for hours to review their work product.  Most of the students do a professional job on this assignment.  </p>
<p>One might think this resource—law students with writing-for-readability training—could be a way for legal departments to redraft documents cost-effectively.</p>
<p>That probably won&#8217;t happen, though, as the student work is rejected in favor of the original document at least 90% of the time. Those originals, apparently in hindsight, &#8220;ain&#8217;t broke.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
