March 2, 2009 Article in The Lawyers Weekly on “Plain Language Movement”

The current issue of the Canadian periodical The Lawyers Weekly contains an article entitled “Plain Language Movement Gaining Steam.” It’s a useful introduction, although regular readers of this blog won’t be surprised by what it has to say. And it quotes some contract-drafting guy …

Incidentally, I explained in this November 2006 post why I refer to “standard English” rather than “plain language.”

Bookmark and Share

This website uses IntenseDebate comments, but they are not currently loaded because either your browser doesn't support JavaScript, or they didn't load fast enough.

2 Comments to “Article in The Lawyers Weekly on “Plain Language Movement””

  1. Art says:

    Ken, why not avoid both the dumbing down association of “plain language” and the cultural hegemony issues of “standard English”, by using a phrase such as “clear language”? I think clarity is what we are aiming for in any case, rather than standarisation or plainness per se.

  2. Ken Adams says:

    Art: I’m OK with “standard English.” For one thing, it’s not meant to connote standardization, but rather English as it’s actually spoken and written by educated native-English speakers and writers. And second, it’s an accepted phrase; the less I have to invent, the better. Ken

Post a comment