<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Contractual&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/18/contractual/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/18/contractual/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Defining &#8220;Government Body&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/18/contractual/comment-page-1/#comment-92784</link>
		<dc:creator>AdamsDrafting &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Defining &#8220;Government Body&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 17:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=987#comment-92784</guid>
		<description>[...] for the same reason that I prefer using contract rather than contractual as an adjective. (See here.) And I opted for body rather than authority because it seemed simpler and clearer. Authority can [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] for the same reason that I prefer using contract rather than contractual as an adjective. (See here.) And I opted for body rather than authority because it seemed simpler and clearer. Authority can [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/18/contractual/comment-page-1/#comment-92709</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 12:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=987#comment-92709</guid>
		<description>Balamurugan: I don&#039;t think so. Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Balamurugan: I don&#8217;t think so. Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Balamurugan Rajendran</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/18/contractual/comment-page-1/#comment-92706</link>
		<dc:creator>Balamurugan Rajendran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 07:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=987#comment-92706</guid>
		<description>Interesting to note the usage of &#039;contractual&#039;.

Is it meaningful to use the adjective &#039;contractual&#039; when referring to &#039;contractual risks&#039; and &#039;contractual rate of progress&#039; as compared to &#039;contract risks&#039; and &#039;contract rate of progress&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to note the usage of &#8216;contractual&#8217;.</p>
<p>Is it meaningful to use the adjective &#8216;contractual&#8217; when referring to &#8216;contractual risks&#8217; and &#8216;contractual rate of progress&#8217; as compared to &#8216;contract risks&#8217; and &#8216;contract rate of progress&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

