<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Drafting Up&#8221; and Extraneous Prepositions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 01:23:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/comment-page-1/#comment-92756</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=996#comment-92756</guid>
		<description>Mirko: To &lt;em&gt;sign off on&lt;/em&gt; something means to approve it, even without having actually signed anything. That&#039;s different from simply &lt;em&gt;signing&lt;/em&gt; something. Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mirko: To <em>sign off on</em> something means to approve it, even without having actually signed anything. That&#8217;s different from simply <em>signing</em> something. Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirko</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/comment-page-1/#comment-92755</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=996#comment-92755</guid>
		<description>Ken

In correspondence with Americans I repeatedly come accross the verb &quot;sign&quot; followed by &quot;off&quot; in connection with the signing of legal documents. I though that &quot;to sign off&quot; means the same as &quot;to sign&quot; a contract/document. Am I correct?

Mirko</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken</p>
<p>In correspondence with Americans I repeatedly come accross the verb &#8220;sign&#8221; followed by &#8220;off&#8221; in connection with the signing of legal documents. I though that &#8220;to sign off&#8221; means the same as &#8220;to sign&#8221; a contract/document. Am I correct?</p>
<p>Mirko</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/comment-page-1/#comment-92753</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 17:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=996#comment-92753</guid>
		<description>Jack: The &lt;em&gt;up&lt;/em&gt; in &lt;em&gt;draft up&lt;/em&gt; might indeed be borrowed from &lt;em&gt;draw up&lt;/em&gt;, but that&#039;s just guesswork on my part.

Robert: Whether any given &lt;em&gt;up&lt;/em&gt; (or any other preposition associated with a verb) is gratuitous involves comparing the meanings with and without the preposition. I think that &lt;em&gt;mark up&lt;/em&gt; has a much more specific meaning than just &lt;em&gt;mark&lt;/em&gt;.

Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack: The <em>up</em> in <em>draft up</em> might indeed be borrowed from <em>draw up</em>, but that&#8217;s just guesswork on my part.</p>
<p>Robert: Whether any given <em>up</em> (or any other preposition associated with a verb) is gratuitous involves comparing the meanings with and without the preposition. I think that <em>mark up</em> has a much more specific meaning than just <em>mark</em>.</p>
<p>Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/comment-page-1/#comment-92750</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 04:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=996#comment-92750</guid>
		<description>We commonly &quot;mark up&quot; documents to show changes which have been accepted or rejected.  In that context I would have thought &quot;marking up&quot; would be OK.  No?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We commonly &#8220;mark up&#8221; documents to show changes which have been accepted or rejected.  In that context I would have thought &#8220;marking up&#8221; would be OK.  No?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/comment-page-1/#comment-92749</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 13:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=996#comment-92749</guid>
		<description>Is &quot;draft up&quot; a vestige of the days when laywers would &quot;draw up&quot; a contract?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is &#8220;draft up&#8221; a vestige of the days when laywers would &#8220;draw up&#8221; a contract?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/comment-page-1/#comment-92721</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 20:23:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=996#comment-92721</guid>
		<description>Brett: I don&#039;t think so, as adding &lt;em&gt;up&lt;/em&gt; after &lt;em&gt;take&lt;/em&gt; changes the meaning. If you delete &lt;em&gt;up&lt;/em&gt; from the following sentence, it no longer makes senses: &lt;em&gt;Let&#039;s take up where he left off.&lt;/em&gt; To see all the prepositions you can use with &lt;em&gt;take&lt;/em&gt;, go to http://www.thefreedictionary.com/take. Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brett: I don&#8217;t think so, as adding <em>up</em> after <em>take</em> changes the meaning. If you delete <em>up</em> from the following sentence, it no longer makes senses: <em>Let&#8217;s take up where he left off.</em> To see all the prepositions you can use with <em>take</em>, go to <a href="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/take" rel="nofollow">http://www.thefreedictionary.com/take</a>. Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/comment-page-1/#comment-92715</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=996#comment-92715</guid>
		<description>It would seem that &quot;take up&quot; falls into such a category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would seem that &#8220;take up&#8221; falls into such a category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken Adams</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/comment-page-1/#comment-92713</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:23:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=996#comment-92713</guid>
		<description>David: You can use a range of prepositions with any number of verbs (such as &lt;em&gt;run&lt;/em&gt;), with the meaning changing drastically with each preposition. But that&#039;s a different matter than the urge to tack on prepositions without changing meaning. Ken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David: You can use a range of prepositions with any number of verbs (such as <em>run</em>), with the meaning changing drastically with each preposition. But that&#8217;s a different matter than the urge to tack on prepositions without changing meaning. Ken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Scrimshaw</title>
		<link>http://www.adamsdrafting.com/2009/07/21/drafting-up/comment-page-1/#comment-92712</link>
		<dc:creator>David Scrimshaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 18:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.adamsdrafting.com/?p=996#comment-92712</guid>
		<description>It seems interesting to me that &quot;write&quot; can be followed with &quot;up&quot;, &quot;down&quot; and &quot;out&quot;. 

I was thinking that &quot;down&quot; and &quot;out&quot; wouldn&#039;t also go with &quot;draft&quot;, but Google turns up a fair number of hits on &quot;drafting out&quot; and &quot;draft out&quot;, but they seem to be more in context of drawings than contracts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems interesting to me that &#8220;write&#8221; can be followed with &#8220;up&#8221;, &#8220;down&#8221; and &#8220;out&#8221;. </p>
<p>I was thinking that &#8220;down&#8221; and &#8220;out&#8221; wouldn&#8217;t also go with &#8220;draft&#8221;, but Google turns up a fair number of hits on &#8220;drafting out&#8221; and &#8220;draft out&#8221;, but they seem to be more in context of drawings than contracts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

