• Home
  • About
    • Credentials
    • Press
  • Consulting
  • Speaking
    • Public Seminars
    • In-House Seminars
    • Webcasts
  • Automation
  • Writing
    • A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting
    • The Structure of M&A Contracts
    • Articles
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Layout Templates
    • The Numbering Assistant
  • Contact

Adams on Contract Drafting

Archives for July 2016

More Underwhelming English Caselaw on “Warrants”

Posted on July 31, 2016 by Ken Adams

Via this IP Draughts post, we learn that another English court has held that if a set of statements of fact is introduced by warrants, those statements of fact do not also constitute representations giving rise to a claim for damages under the Misrepresentation Act 1967. Mark notes that this opinion is of limited interest, as it involves only a hearing of an application for summary judgment, … [Read more...]

Posted in Selected Usages 5 Comments

Revisiting How to Express Termination with Prior Notice

Posted on July 27, 2016 by Ken Adams

I love it when after writing about a usage and describing it as awkward, I'm able to demonstrate that it's not only awkward, it can also lead to fights. Today's example of that is my December 2015 post about how to express termination with prior notice (here). Today a reader emailed me as follows: Suppose a termination provision of a contract reads, “After August 1, 2016, either party may … [Read more...]

Posted in Selected Provisions 6 Comments

“Including at Least”

Posted on July 26, 2016 by Ken Adams

This week a reader asked me about including at least—yet another phrase I'd never thought about before. That phrase is unobjectionable when it's used to express that a given set must including a minimum number, or minimum proportion, of something or other. Here are some random examples from EDGAR: … the Parties shall refer such dispute to the Chief Executive Officer of CG and the Chief … [Read more...]

Posted in Selected Usages 5 Comments

Save the Date: London, 8 November, Panel Discussion on Contract Drafting

Posted on July 24, 2016 by Ken Adams

I'm delighted that on Tuesday, 8 November 2016, from 18:00 to 19:30, you will find me at the UCL Events Pavillion, Main Quad, Gower Street, London WC1. That's because I'll be taking part in a panel discussion hosted by UCL Faculty of Laws entitled Dysfunction in Contract Drafting: Are the Courts, Law Firms, and Company Law Departments Stuck in a Rut? It will be free of charge. I'll be in town … [Read more...]

Posted in Seminars 4 Comments

Glenn West on the “Why” of Contract Drafting

Posted on July 22, 2016 by Ken Adams

Via @lisasolomon I learned of a new piece by Glenn West. It's entitled Contract Drafting 101: A Checklist Derived from Recent Caselaw, and it forms part of the materials for a course for in-house counsel offered on 10 August 2016 by the State Bar of Texas. It's available here. For information about the course, go here. In this piece, Glenn considers recent caselaw that illustrates why certain … [Read more...]

Posted in Process Leave a Comment

Yet Another “Efforts” Standard: “Good Efforts”!

Posted on July 22, 2016 by Ken Adams

Longtime readers will know that I make it a point periodically to prod the carcass that is the notion that different efforts standards impose obligations of different levels of onerousness. Well, it's time to prod the carcass once more. This morning I used the phrase good reason. That led me to ponder the rhetorical function of good in that phrase—what's the difference between doing something … [Read more...]

Posted in Selected Usages 5 Comments

On “This Agreement” and Sweating the Small Stuff

Posted on July 22, 2016 by Ken Adams

You're a client. I give you my redraft of one of your templates. We discuss my version. During those discussions, you ask that I restore the capital A to this agreement. Here's what MSCD 2.110–.110 says about that: It’s common practice to create in the introductory clause the defined term this Agreement. … But this defined term is unnecessary: the definite article this in references to this … [Read more...]

Posted in Consulting, Front of the Contract 18 Comments

The Endless Inefficiency of M&A Drafting

Posted on July 20, 2016 by Ken Adams

You might find of interest The Inefficient Evolution of Merger Agreements, a law-review article by two law-school professors, Robert Anderson and Jeffrey Manns. (You can get a PDF copy here.) The authors did something that is still relatively novel when it comes to study of contract drafting—they engaged in empirical research. Specifically, they used computer textual analysis to analyze 12,000 … [Read more...]

Posted in Inertia, M&A 1 Comment

The UK Is Designing Government Contracts for the Digital Age

Posted on July 16, 2016 by Ken Adams

My post on contracting by the US states (here) prompted @CherylStephens to inform me on Twitter of this post from a couple of days ago on the UK government blog Digital Marketplace. It's by Jason Waterman from the Crown Commercial Service and Warren Smith from Government Digital Service, and it's entitled Working together to design government contracts for the digital age. It's commendable, and … [Read more...]

Posted in Process 4 Comments

State Contracting Needs Help

Posted on July 16, 2016 by Ken Adams

I noted with interest this article on problems with Virginia's contracting  system. I'll take the liberty of quoting most of it: Virginia’s $6 billion-a-year contracting system has serious flaws — including multi-million dollar contracts managed by untrained staff and contracts that are prepared without legal review, according to a new state report issued Monday. The General Assembly’s … [Read more...]

Posted in Process Leave a Comment

Update on My “Advanced” Categories-of-Contract-Language Seminar

Posted on July 13, 2016 by Ken Adams

My core seminar is the "Drafting Clearer Contracts" seminar. I've been doing it for, oh, eleven years, as both public and in-house seminars. I do more of them with each passing year. It's humming along nicely. I've also started doing another seminar. The marketing materials describe it as "advanced," but the more specific part of the title is "An Intensive Program in the Categories of Contract … [Read more...]

Posted in Seminars Leave a Comment

Defining “Knowledge” to Include What Someone Should Have Known

Posted on July 10, 2016 by Ken Adams

Starting at 13.364, MSCD considers the elements that go into a definition of the defined term Knowledge. One element that discussion doesn't include is the possibility of Knowledge being defined to include information that the person in question should have known. That's knows as "constructive knowledge," and it features in the following definitions exhumed from the potter's field … [Read more...]

Posted in M&A, Selected Usages 11 Comments

“Aforesaid” and “Aforementioned”

Posted on July 6, 2016 by Ken Adams

You recall my recent post about the foregoing (here)? Well, suppress your gag reflex and meet its close relatives, aforesaid and aforementioned. The word aforesaid comes in two flavors. First, it occurs in the phrase as aforesaid: Each such notice, request or other communication shall be effective (i) if given by mail, 72 hours after such communication is deposited in the mails with first … [Read more...]

Posted in Selected Usages 2 Comments

Spare Us the Legalistic BS: I Respond to an Item on “Above the Law”

Posted on July 6, 2016 by Ken Adams

Last Friday I noticed this post on Above the Law. It's by Stefan Savic, an associate at the law firm Balestriere Fariello. The title is Legalese: Won’t Do With It, Can’t Do Without It. According to Savic, traditional contract legalese is impenetrable. He says that although lawyers have been encouraged to use plain English, "the day-to-day legal universe has been slow to move away from archaic … [Read more...]

Posted in Inertia 5 Comments

Fine-Tuning LexCheck (Featuring “Promptly”)

Posted on July 5, 2016 by Ken Adams

In this post I reminded you all that I’m involved with LexCheck, the contract-checking software. Part of the challenge in developing LexCheck has been determining what we tell the software to do. For one thing, I’m acutely aware that there’s a difference between your electing to consult A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting and my blog posts and my in effect whispering in your ear as … [Read more...]

Posted in Technology 4 Comments

An Update on LexCheck, the Contract-Checking Software

Posted on July 5, 2016 by Ken Adams

[Updated 4 April 2018: I'm no longer an advisor to LexCheck (formerly Lit IQ), and the last time I did any work for them was in 2016.] You know the 1950s movie Forbidden Planet. No? You should check it out—it’s an odd mix of retro camp and legit eeriness. In any event, the plot of the movie involves—spoiler alert!—technology that’s a manifestation of one of the characters. That reminds me of … [Read more...]

Posted in Technology 3 Comments

“Is Permitted”

Posted on July 3, 2016 by Ken Adams

There's no end to the suboptimal alternatives to may. Here's another—is permitted. You see is permitted to when a party is the subject of the sentence or clause: … Sponsor is permitted to assign this Agreement in connection with a merger or a sale or transfer of substantially all of its assets … … neither the Seller nor the Purchaser shall enforce any remedies against the other's Primary … [Read more...]

Posted in Categories of Contract Language 9 Comments

Search

Connect

  • Email
  • Google+
  • Linkedin
  • Twitter

Subscribe

  • RSS Feed
  • Newsletter
In addition to Ken’s posts from February 2013, this blog contains Ken’s posts from The Koncise Drafter (from December 2010 to February 2013) and from the AdamsDrafting blog (from May 2006 to December 2010).

Categories

Archives

Work with M&A contracts?

Drafting Clearer Contracts Seminars

Adams Contracts Consulting LLC
Kenneth A. Adams | Adams on Contract Drafting
© 2018 Kenneth A. Adams | kadams@adamsdrafting.com | (516) 318-6956