What BigLaw Partners Mean When They Say They’re Not Interested in Automated Contract Creation

10 September 2014 | Ken Adams

A good number of law firms are ContractExpress customers. Goodwin Procter. Latham & Watkins. Perkins Coie. Wilson Sonsini. And so on.
But recently I’ve spoken with a few BigLaw partners who have said that they don’t currently use contract automation and have no plans to do so.

This post is on Contract-Automation Clearinghouse. To see the rest, go here.

Contract-Automation Clearinghouse is where I now put my posts on contract automation and related topics.

About the author

Ken Adams is the leading authority on how to say clearly whatever you want to say in a contract. He’s author of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting, and he offers online and in-person training around the world. He’s also chief content officer of LegalSifter, Inc., a company that combines artificial intelligence and expertise to assist with review of contracts.

2 thoughts on “What BigLaw Partners Mean When They Say They’re Not Interested in Automated Contract Creation”

Bradley B. Clark
12 September 2014 at 7:17 pm
Ken: one of the things that makes your blog one of the best is the fact that you’ve built a community by engaging your readers. By moving content to the ContractExpress blog (where engagement isn’t allowed) that opportunity is lacking.
Reply
- Ken Adams
  13 September 2014 at 12:48 pm
  Bradley: You’re of course right. It’s something I’m trying to fix. Ken
  Reply

2 thoughts on “What BigLaw Partners Mean When They Say They’re Not Interested in Automated Contract Creation”

Leave a Comment Cancel reply

The voice that matters.