Month: February 2007

“Sticky Contracts”

I just learned a new term—”sticky contracts.” It refers to the tendency of drafters to stick with a given form contract, even if it contains suboptimal provisions. Gordon Smith has a post on the subject at the Conglomerate blog. Gordon discusses some possible causes of stickiness. As I suggested in a comment to his post, I’d be inclined to attribute … Read More

Rethinking “Material” and “Material Adverse Change”

I should have had enough of material and material adverse change, given that I discuss materiality in chapter 7 of MSCD, in this law review article, and in this article in the M&A Lawyer. But the topic continued to nag at me, and recently the fog cleared—I realized that my analysis was significantly flawed, and I also figured out how … Read More

Third Toronto “Intensive Contract Drafting Workshop”

On Monday, April 30th and Tuesday, May 1st, I’ll be in Toronto giving my third “Intensive Contract Drafting Workshop,” as usual under the auspices of Osgoode Hall Law School’s Professional Development Program. To find out more, click here to go to the Professional Development Program’s website and click here to see the brochure. As in the previous workshops, the first … Read More

“That” and “Which”

I’m grateful to David Gurfein, an associate in the New York office of Cozen O’Connor, for informing me of AIU Insurance Co. v. Robert Plan Corp., 14 Misc.3d 1216(A), 2006 WL 3904521 (N.Y. Sup. Dec. 26, 2006). This case considers how confusion over the distinction between that and which can result in ambiguity. (Click here for a copy of the … Read More

New Article on Using Wikis in Contract Drafting

Today’s issue of the New York Law Journal contains my first bi-monthly “Contract Drafting” column. It’s in the inaugural issue of a new monthly section, “GC New York.” (Click here to go to a copy of the column on the “GC New York” website; in the future, you may need to register. You may find this version prints better.) Entitled … Read More

Simplifying Contracts

Reader David Munn recently wrote this item regarding an interview in which Tim Cummins of the International Association for Contract and Commercial Management asked the heads of Legal and Audit at Scottish & Newcastle, one of the world’s largest brewers, about their contract simplification program, called Pathclear. Click here to go IACCM’s web page about the interview; click here to … Read More

New Jersey Business Law Symposium

On March 9th I’ll be one of the speakers at the 2007 Business Law Symposium organized by the New Jersey Institute for Continuing Legal Education. It will be held at the Sheraton at Woodbridge Place, in Iselin, New Jersey. I’ll be conducting a 1.5 hour seminar in the afternoon on the structure of M&A contracts. I’m finishing up an article … Read More

Superfluous Provisions

A reader recently sent me the following email: I’d appreciate your comments on an issue that’s been plaguing me off and on. I often see contracts with a fixed term. This works for a lease or license or a funding agreement where government agrees to provide funding to an entity for a specific period. At the end of that period, … Read More

Yesterday’s Seminar in New York

My New York “Contract Drafting—Language and Layout” seminar took place yesterday. I haven’t yet reviewed the evaluations, but the participants appeared to have found it very useful. For my part, I enjoyed myself—giving a seminar is a good antidote to staring at the computer screen. And I remembered to mute the wireless microphone during the breaks—a minor triumph. As usual, … Read More

“Termination” and “Expiration”

During a recent in-house seminar, a participant took issue with one of my sample provisions, namely This agreement terminates on August 23, 2007. The participant argued that termination entails one or more parties’ ending a contract sooner than it otherwise would have ended; he said that in this case the correct word to use would have been expires. At the … Read More