I’ll soon be resuming my itinerant ways. In particular, my first public seminar of 2009 is on February 24, in Houston. And 2009 just got busier, as I’ve added some new “Contract Drafting—Language and Layout” public seminar dates, namely U.S. dates for the second half of 2009 and new Toronto and Vancouver dates. Click here for the details. Remember that … Read More
To accomplish any given drafting goal, one usage will be more efficient than the others. Once you accept that notion, it follows that it would make sense for drafters to join other writers in using a manual of style. That’s why I wrote A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. Use of a manual of style in a given population … Read More
Today Rees Morrision posted this item on his blog. It makes the point that groups are good for sharing information but not so good for making decisions. It also quotes an academic as saying that “Groups are not helpful in getting people to make better decisions, but they’re helpful in getting people to feel more confident about the decisions they’ve … Read More
This post earlier this month considered how to ensure that people on the other side of a deal don’t balk at MSCD-compliant language. But what if it’s your outside counsel that’s not playing along? In this post from last weekend I said that company law departments are best positioned to drive change, in that they’re the ones who pay the … Read More
In this post from earlier this month, I expressed incredulity at the idea of my being able to make good use of Twitter—what I do doesn’t come in installments of no more than 140 characters. But following up on a suggestion by commenter Jonathan Handel, I’ve arranged matters so that every time I post on the blog a tweet gets … Read More
A couple of recent posts (this one and this one) prompted some gnashing of teeth and rending of clothes by commenters frustrated at the pushback they encounter when they use clear, efficient, and modern contract language. So I thought it might be worthwhile for me to elaborate on something I offered in this comment. Here goes: I’m optimistic about the … Read More
Thanks to Bryan Sims of The Connected Lawyer, I came across (1) this useful post by TechnoEsq on the different ways of signing legal documents electronically and (2) this post by Ernie Svenson, wearing his PDF for Lawyers hat, on one of those ways of signing, namely using digital signatures. By way of a reminder, digital signatures form part of … Read More
Rees Morrison, prolific blogger on all things law-department-related, posted this item about free legal forms available online. Here’s what it says: As the online world inexorably proves that information wants to be free, in-house counsel will increasingly have more forms of agreements available online, and at no cost. One example of the genre is YourFreeLegalForms.com. According to an email exchange … Read More
Here’s the approach that’s reflected in MSCD: If you could accomplish any given drafting goal in a number of different ways, consistency and efficiency would be enhanced if you, and everyone else, were to choose, and stick with, just one of the ways. And if you look closely, more often than not one of the different ways will prove to … Read More
In this October 2008 blog post I said that together with is usually a roundabout way of saying, depending on the circumstances, and or with or plus. Well, it just crossed my mind that a related usage is as well as—you should be able to use and instead. Often together with and as well as contribute to a long-winded recitation … Read More
