Month: November 2012

“The Koncise Drafter” in the ABA Journal’s 2012 Blawg 100

In case it’s of interest to any readers, this blog was included in the ABA Journal’s 2012 Blawg 100. It’s nice to be noticed; thank you to those readers who saw fit to nominate this blog. Any such “best of” compilation is necessarily somewhat arbitrary, but I think the ABA Journal does a good job. But I won’t be asking … Read More

Quora as a Source of Misinformation

Taking up a challenge posed by Brian Rogers, last week I posted a response to this question on Quora. (For more about that, see this post.) That was my first time on Quora; to get a better sense of what it was about, over the next few days I answered some more questions. (To see my answers, go to my … Read More

Asia Seminars February–March 2013

I’m pleased to announce that I’ll be returning to Asia in spring 2013. With Thomson Reuters, I’ll be doing a one-day seminar in Singapore on 21 February 2013 (go here for the brochure) and in Hong Kong on 5 March 2013 (go here for the brochure). This seminar is entitled “The Essentials of Drafting Clear, Concise & Modern Contracts,” but … Read More

Why I Won’t Be Writing a Book on Boilerplate

Today’s post on boilerplate reminded me that recently a publisher asked me whether I’d be interested in writing a book on contract boilerplate. I said I would not. For one thing, I have no room in my life for preparing anything on the scale of Tina Stark’s Negotiating and Drafting Contract Boilerplate. But more to the point, the vast majority … Read More

Rethinking the “No Assignment” Provision

In this post, Brian Rogers explains how, as an experiment in crowdsourcing contract language, he has posted on Quora (here) his candidate for “the best anti-assignment provision in a contract ever.” He says that it’s “probably lifted” from Negotiating and Drafting Contract Boilerplate (Tina Stark ed. 2003) (NDCB). Here’s Brian’s provision: Neither party may assign any of its rights under … Read More

Audit Your Outside Counsel’s Contract-Drafting Process?

This article by Monica Bay in Law Technology News caught my eye. It describes how D. Casey Flaherty, corporate counsel at Kia Motors, uses an audit program to assess how cost-effective its outside counsel are in handling basic, frequently recurring billable tasks: The firm’s sacrificial lamb associate is asked to perform four mock tasks, that are evaluated by the outside counsel. Examples … Read More

“May Refuse To”

Consider the following: Orbitz may refuse to deliver Shares to the Employee if Employee fails to comply with Employee’s obligations in connection with the Tax Related Items. Refusal is in response to a request. Instead of may refuse, I’d always use that standard component of language of discretion, is not required to. It allows you to address the issue on a more fundamental … Read More

The Nature of Expertise

In this recent blog post, I considered a kind of ambiguity relating to or that I hadn’t encountered previously. My first, and offline, attempt at an analysis was feeble. My next attempt, which I posted, made a good deal more sense, but a prominent linguist pointed out several flaws and offered his take on those issues, which I cheerfully co-opted. … Read More