Month: May 2013

From Lawyer to Contract-Management Professional: A One-Way Trip?

In this 2009 post I wrote about the respective roles of lawyers and contract-management personnel in the contract process. That’s what led a reader to send me the following: I am an attorney licensed to practice since 2009 and, since graduating law school have been working in a small, general practice law office as an associate attorney. My current position focuses … Read More

Making Changes to the Other Side’s Legalese-Filled Draft

I received the following question from a reader: When working with a contract that (1) comes from the other side, (2) is not game for complete redrafting, and (3) is in legalese, not English, do you suggest trying to adopt the conventions you find there (if there are any), or do you think it’s clearer to write the changes in … Read More

Do I Ignore What Courts Might Say? What the Other Side Might Say?

In case it’s of interest, below is my response to feedback I received from someone who attended one of my recent international seminars. The first issue discussed is one I also addressed in this recent post. I’m pleased that you found the seminar worthwhile, but of course what particularly caught my eye was your final comment: Appreciate your crusade for … Read More

“Thing”

The other day @bradykrissesq posed the following question on Twitter: What is the legal significance of a contract requirement to “do all things”? — Brady Kriss (@bradykrissesq) April 30, 2013 Although it’s not the most crucial drafting issue, Brady, this one’s for you … Here are three instances of use of thing or things in contracts on EDGAR: … each … Read More