Archive for May, 2008



The Duration of Confidentiality Agreements

Wednesday, May 21st, 2008

Reader David recently posed the following question: I have a question for you that has bugged me for several years. From time to time, my company shares company-related information with a third party and, before doing so, enters into a confidentiality agreement (CA) [also known as a nondisclosure agreement—KAA] with the third party. Our CA [...]

“Continuance”

Tuesday, May 20th, 2008

Reader Steven Sholk sent me a case today. I found it of interest, but not for the reason he anticipated. What caught my eye was the phrase during continuance of this agreement. A search of the SEC’s EDGAR database showed that it’s not a complete rarity: it occurs in about 200 contracts filed in the [...]

A New Article on “Best Efforts”

Monday, May 12th, 2008

Reader Larry Bell pointed out to me that the April 2008 issue of Corporate Counsel’s Quarterly contains an article by the publisher’s editorial staff entitled “Best Efforts Clauses.” I’m afraid that I can’t provide a link, as I have only a hard copy. When it comes to guidance on drafting usages, I’m not particularly a [...]

Overlapping Definitions—A Real Issue?

Sunday, May 11th, 2008

I recently posted this item discussing Lexicon, a tool for organizing and checking defined terms. Lexicon’s website contains a page discussing “The Seven Deadly Sins of Defined Terms.” Among the sins described is the following: Overlapping Definitions–When one Defined Term is contained within another, confusion can arise. For example, if (1) “Company,” (2) “Company Promissory [...]

Fall 2008 Penn Law Contract-Redrafting Project—Now Accepting Submissions!

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

It’s that time again: I’m looking for a company that would be interested in taking part in a contract-redrafting project with my class at the University of Pennsylvania Law School. The idea is that I’ll select one contract out of those submitted by June 15. In the fall 2008 semester my class will redraft all [...]

Doing an Online Run-Through of My Seminars

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

Considering having me do an in-house seminar but want to know more? Then I suggest you might want to have me give you and any other decisionmaker at your organization a run-through of whichever of my seminars interests you, “Contract Drafting—Language and Layout” or “The Structure of M&A Contracts.” We’d use GoToMeeting or WebEx so [...]

Some Recently Published Books on Contract Drafting

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

A few books on contract drafting have been published in the last couple of years: Butt, Peter & Castle, Richard, Modern Legal Drafting: A Guide to Using Clearer Language (2d ed. 2006). Darmstadter, Howard, Hereof, Thereof, and Everywhereof (2d ed. 2008).  Haggard, Thomas R., and Kuney, George W., Legal Drafting in a Nutshell (3d ed. [...]

MSCD2 Production Notes

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

In case you’re interested, here’s the latest on MSCD2: I wasn’t satisfied with the design of MSCD, so I was ready for a fight over the design of MSCD2. But I’ve just seen some sample pages, and they look great. I’m already looking forward to seeing the finished product. I’m currently working on the last [...]

Outage

Thursday, May 8th, 2008

The site was offline for most of yesterday due to high drama involving my server. Sorry about that; it shouldn’t happen again.

New 2008 U.S. Seminar Dates

Sunday, May 4th, 2008

Here are the U.S. cities where I’ll be giving my “Contract Drafting—Language and Layout” seminar with West Legalworks in the second half of 2008: Seattle, Thursday, July 17 Washington, D.C., Wednesday, September 24 Minneapolis, Thursday, October 16 Boston, Wednesday, October 29 New York, Tuesday, November 18 San Francisco, Tuesday, December 9 Click here to go [...]

Capitalization in References to U.S. States

Sunday, May 4th, 2008

Here’s what The Chicago Manual of Style 8.55 has to say about use of initial capitals in references to political divisions: Words denoting political divisions—from empire, republic, and state down to ward and precinct—are capitalized when they follow a name and are used as an accepted part of the name. When preceding the name, such [...]

More Words Not to Include in a Contract— “Therefore” and Its Relatives

Friday, May 2nd, 2008

In this November 2006 post I wrote about words that are fine in narrative writing but would be out of place in a contract. Well, I’ve thought of some more—therefore and related words such as thus, hence, and consequently. Here’s an example I just spotted: The term of this agreement will end three years following [...]