My New Article on the “Successors and Assigns” Provision

The June/July 2013 issue of The Advocate, published by the Idaho State Bar, contains my article It’s Time to Get Rid of the “Successors and …

Continue Reading »

Posted in My Articles, Selected Provisions | 4 Comments

What’s the Point of This Provision Specifying Drafting Conventions?

I recently saw in a contract the following provision specifying drafting conventions: Reference to any English legal term shall, in respect of any jurisdiction other …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Provisions | 2 Comments

Winding Up the Spring Seminar Season

Yesterday I gave in New Jersey, before a good crowd, my last “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar for West LegalEdcenter for the first half of the …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Seminars | Leave a comment

Making Sneaky Changes to a Contract Before Signing It

In this post on his Connecticut Employment Law Blog, Daniel Schwartz tells an odd story, one that he first saw in Wolters Kluwer’s Employment Law …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | 13 Comments

Two More Reviews of MSCD3

You can find on ContractsProf Blog two reviews of the third edition of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. Go here for a review …

Continue Reading »

Posted in MSCD | 2 Comments

“Generally”

Here’s what Garner’s Modern American Usage has to say about generally: generally has three basic meanings: (1) “disregarding insignificant exceptions” <the quality of the acting …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages, Vagueness | 3 Comments

“Usually”

The problem with the word usually isn’t just that it’s vague. Instead, it’s that it exhibits the free-floating vagueness that we previously encountered in substantially …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages, Vagueness | 8 Comments

Someone Else Takes On “Tested” Contract Language

For lawyers unwilling or unable to overhaul their traditional contract language, the excuse of choice is that traditional language has been “tested”—if you meddle with …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Inertia | Leave a comment

The Serial Comma Can Cause Ambiguity

The serial comma is the comma used immediately before the and or or preceding the final item in a list of three or more items. I wrote about the serial …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Ambiguity | 3 Comments

The Nexus Between Contracts and the Law

If they want to avoid causing problems for themselves, parties to a contract should bear in mind that the law interacts with contracts in various …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Issue Spotting | 3 Comments

Learned Helplessness and Contract Drafting

Here’s how Wikipedia describes “learned helplessness”: Learned helplessness is the condition of a human or animal that has learned to behave helplessly, failing to respond even …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | Leave a comment

Hey, Bar Associations! Want Your CLE Session to Be Well Attended? Make It About Contract Drafting

In my experience, people will turn out for continuing-legal-education sessions on contract drafting. For example, at those annual meetings of the Association of Corporate Counsel …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Seminars | Leave a comment

“Indemnify For, From, and Against”

In the discussion with Brian Buckham that gave rise to today’s other post on indemnification, Brian also mentioned use of the triplet for, from, and …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages | Leave a comment

“Indemnify From” Versus “Indemnify For”

Another of the speakers at last week’s CLE session in Boise organized by the Idaho State Bar (see this post) was Brian Buckham, of IDACORP, …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages | 10 Comments

“Primarily”

At last Friday’s CLE session in Boise, I sat in on a lunchtime presentation by Ken Howell, of the law firm Hawley Troxell, on recent …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages | 2 Comments

Notes from the Road: Idaho

Greetings from Boise! I’ve spent most of the week in Idaho at the request of the Idaho State Bar. The first stop was Coeur d’Alene …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Notes from the Road | 1 Comment

Tactics for Tackling Inertia: Green, Yellow, and Red

In this post and this post I explain why my approach to contract language doesn’t favor clarity over avoiding risk. There’s no plausible reason for …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | Leave a comment

LawInsider.com: A New Database of EDGAR Contracts

A site called LawInsider.com has launched what it describes as a searchable database consisting of every contract on the SEC’s EDGAR system—over 250,000 contracts. And …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Technology | 2 Comments

Back to Babel: LinkedIn Groups as a Source of Information on Contract Drafting

Three LinkedIn groups feature discussions related to contract drafting. “Contract & Commercial Management” caters primarily to contract-management professionals; you have to ask to join. I …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Odds and Ends | 1 Comment

Another Reaction to the Third Edition of MSCD

In this post on China Law Blog, Dan Harris expresses his opinion about the third edition of MSCD. An enthusiastic thumbs-up from someone like Dan? …

Continue Reading »

Posted in MSCD | Leave a comment

From Lawyer to Contract-Management Professional: A One-Way Trip?

In this 2009 post I wrote about the respective roles of lawyers and contract-management personnel in the contract process. That’s what led a reader to send …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | 4 Comments

Making Changes to the Other Side’s Legalese-Filled Draft

I received the following question from a reader: When working with a contract that (1) comes from the other side, (2) is not game for …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | 2 Comments

Redraft This Sentence, MSCD Style: My Version of an “Irreparable Harm” Provision

In this recent post I invited readers to redraft a sentence that I had plucked, at random, from EDGAR. And you responded enthusiastically. (I’ve shelved …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Provisions | 12 Comments

Do I Ignore What Courts Might Say? What the Other Side Might Say?

In case it’s of interest, below is my response to feedback I received from someone who attended one of my recent international seminars. The first …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Seminars | 3 Comments

The Moral of a Recent Second Circuit Opinion: Don’t Rely on Commas for Disambiguation

Via this post by Ray Ward I learned of the recent opinion of the Second Circuit Court of Appeals in AIG v. Bank of America …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Ambiguity | 8 Comments

“Thing”

The other day @bradykrissesq posed the following question on Twitter: What is the legal significance of a contract requirement to “do all things”? — Brady …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages | 7 Comments

The Contracts Guy Reviews the Third Edition of MSCD

Brian Rogers, also known as @theContractsGuy, has reviewed the third edition of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. Go here to read it. I’m …

Continue Reading »

Posted in MSCD | 3 Comments

Examining a Recommended Governing-Law Provision

An article in Corporate Counsel by a BigLaw partner and associate (copy here) considers governing-law provisions. It suggests that using the following provision would increase …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Provisions | 16 Comments

How to Fix Your Templates: A Heart-to-Heart Conversation

Oh, hi! It’s you! Do come in. Please take a seat. Would you like some tea? Water? No? OK. Thank you for coming. I’d like …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | Leave a comment

Redraft This Sentence, MSCD Style

This morning I encountered the following sentence on EDGAR: Therefore, the obligations of the Sellers under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the Sellers’ obligation to …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Odds and Ends | 10 Comments

You Can’t Focus on Just “Important” Stuff

Seminar customers will sometimes ask me, in effect, to focus on the important stuff. I respond that it wouldn’t make sense to have me do …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Seminars | Leave a comment

Encouraging Outside Counsel to Improve Their Contract Drafting

You’re an in-house lawyer who consults A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. In fact, it’s widely used in your department—your company does its best to …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Process | 4 Comments

“Ready, Willing, and Able”

The earnest cliché ready, willing, and able occurred in 102 contracts filed on the SEC’s EDGAR system in the past year. That’s not a whole lot, …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages | 2 Comments

A Justice of the Minnesota Supreme Court Might Want to Consider the Rhetorical Function of “Best”

Last month the Minnesota Supreme Court issued its opinion in In re Petition of S.G., 828 N.W.2d 118 (Minn. 2013) (PDF copy here). This opinion …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages | Leave a comment

Advice to a Non-Native English Speaker (Including Links to My Analysis of Different Boilerplate Provisions)

Here’s the text of an email I just sent someone who attended one of my recent European seminars: I’m pleased that you found the seminar …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Teaching | Leave a comment

Save the Date: New 2013 Canada “Drafting Clearer Contracts” Seminars

I’ve scheduled two new Canada “Drafting Clearer Contracts” public seminars for Osgoode Professional Development: Calgary, October 24, 2013 Toronto, November 6, 2013 I’ll put additional …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Seminars | Leave a comment

Severability and Tabulation

At one of my recent European seminars I told the participants that I’m not in favor of the approach to document design that says that …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Layout, Selected Provisions | 2 Comments

Fundraiser for Phillips Academy Andover: Auction of One Lot of Ten Copies of “A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting”

[Updated May 2, 2013: Well, my readership has proved immune to the attractions of half off ten copies of MSCD. Tough crowd! Anyway, thank you …

Continue Reading »

Posted in MSCD | 2 Comments

My New Offering: A One-Hour Presentation

I’ve updated this site’s page on my in-house seminars to note that I’m now offering a one-hour presentation entitled “The Bad (and Good) News About Contract …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Seminars | Leave a comment

Footnotes in Contracts?

A few days ago a reader asked me about a recommendation he saw online to the effect that it might be a good idea to …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Layout | 17 Comments

Reputation Matters

In modern discourse, it’s increasingly important not just to be right, but to be seen to be right. There’s no shortage of people offering, online, …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Odds and Ends | Leave a comment

Lame Word of the Day: “Utmost”

Utmost? WTF! Here are some examples of use of utmost in contracts on EDGAR: … provided that the party so affected shall use its best …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages | 8 Comments

“Because”

I noted with interest Neal Goldfarb’s recent post on LAWnLinguistics about an amicus brief that he filed with the U.S. Supreme Court. His brief concerns …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages | 1 Comment

Notes from the Road: Hamburg

I’ve just left Hamburg after a three-day visit. Some thoughts: I held public seminars on Monday and Tuesday at the offices of ECE Projektmanagement, the …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Notes from the Road | 4 Comments

Issue Spotting an Aspect of Jane Doe’s Employment Agreement

You’ve been asked by Acme to draft an employment  agreement for Jane Doe, Acme’s new head of sales. As part of his muttered instructions to …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Issue Spotting | 1 Comment

“Confirms”

You see confirms used to introduce statements of fact in a contract. Here are two examples from EDGAR: Each Loan Party (i) confirms that prior …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Categories of Contract Language | 1 Comment

Exemplify, A Research Tool for Determining What Is Market

I was recently reminded of Exemplify, “a new breed of research tool for determining market standard language and terms in transactional law practice.” The best …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Technology | Leave a comment

When You Write a Reference Work, You Don’t Want to Screw Up

I recently saw the following in a book: The words “exclusion” and “disclaimer” are sometimes used interchangeably in warranty provisions, but an important legal distinction …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Odds and Ends | Leave a comment

Revisiting “To the Extent That”

MSCD 17.16 deals with the phrase to the extent that. It makes the simple point that although to the extent that is appropriate when the …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Selected Usages | 6 Comments

Should You Pander to Confused Judges?

In yesterday’s post I wrote about how the Appellate Court of Illinois saw value in useless contract language, namely the traditional recital of consideration and “successors …

Continue Reading »

Posted in Odds and Ends | 6 Comments