Longtime readers will be aware that I roll my eyes at the notion of relying on contract language that has been “tested” by courts. As I say in a 2006 blog post, “Why rely on language that resulted in litigation? Instead, express any given concept clearly, so you don’t have to gamble on case law breathing into it the desired … Read More
I’ve written about the defined term this Agreement more often than I might have expected. (See for example this 2018 blog post and this 2016 blog post.) Yet here I am writing about it again, because I’d like to have in one place all my arguments on the subject, including one I’ve articulated only recently—what’s under the heading “An Explanation.” … Read More
In August 2025, ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) published ISO 24495-2:2025 (Plain language — Part 2: Legal communication). Here’s how ISO describes ISO 24495-2: This document deals with legal communication, and it builds on the foundation for plain language in ISO 24495-1. It establishes guidelines and techniques to help authors make sure that readers can readily understand legal communication … Read More
Sporadically, I’m hired to help people in a fight over confusing contract language. That kind of work isn’t my bread and butter, but I should do a lot more of it. Many courts are bad at making sense of confusing contract language. (For two of many examples, see this 2015 article and this 2020 blog post.) And so are many … Read More
One of the joys of scholarship is that it offers plenty of opportunity for you to be a doofus. I’ve taken advantage of that over the years. It goes with the territory: if your scholarship is worth anything, it will venture into the unknown (unknown to you, at least), and the unknown is where you stumble. My most recent opportunity … Read More
File this under “Better late than never.” Way late. The second printing of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting came out in spring 2024. If you have a copy of the first printing, you might want to note in it changes I made to the second printing. Here they are: As changes go, I think we can say they’re … Read More
The image below is from my repost of a LinkedIn post by Chris Lemens, who has been reading my stuff for as long as I have written stuff. What prompted my repost was two comments Chris added to this LinkedIn post by Nada Alnajafi: So Chris makes it explicit—the simplest way to demonstrate your value to Chris would be to … Read More
My notion of offering an on-demand module of my Drafting Clearer Contracts training is slowly shifting from a gleam in my eye to reality. Videos and Quizzes This module will consist of 200+ short videos, some proportion of them accompanied by automated quizzes. The foundation of Drafting Clearer Contracts training is my book A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. … Read More
Recently I encountered this law review article: Tara Chowdhury, Faith Chudkowski & Mitu Gulati, The Form Knows Best, 79 U. of Miami L. Rev. 607 (2025). In this post, I explain two quibbles. I also suggest that the reality the authors describe is better explained by copy-and-pasting, as opposed to being driven by forms. The Article In their article, Chowdhury, … Read More
The image below contains the text of an email message I received from a law student yesterday. In case it’s of interest, here’s how I responded: Hi [Name]. Fortunate is the author who gets this sort of message from a reader! Now that you’re on the road to being an informed consumer of contract language, I offer the following suggestions: … Read More
