I noted with interest Tim Cummins’s post asking whether contract managers and lawyers actually care about contract results (here). Read the post for yourself, but here are the bits that caught my eye: How many contract and commercial managers, how many lawyers, actually care about the quality of the contracts they produce? How many actively monitor or seek to learn … Read More
I apologize in advance: what follows is even more nerdy than usual. In the past few days, two companies have shared with me their template for a two-way confidentiality agreement. In one template, the company responsible for the template is the first entity named in the introductory clause, and it’s given a defined term based on its name. In other words, … Read More
MSCD 10.66 explains why I’m not keen on the term calendar year as a way to avoid ambiguity over what year means. Well, at one of my recent Geneva seminars, a participant introduced me to the term civil year, meaning the twelve months beginning January 1. And lo and behold, it’s on EDGAR. Here’s an example from a contract between … Read More
Acme has an inventory of widgets. For whatever reason, the following is in a contract between Acme and WidgetCo: It is a condition to Acme’s conducting a public sale of widgets that Acme notify WidgetCo in advance of the date and location of that sale. Now compare that to the following: To dispute a DynaCo invoice, XYZ must submit a … Read More
MSCD 13.105 deals with provisions that exclude certain types of damages. Here’s an example: Neither party will be responsible or held liable for any consequential, special, or incidental losses or damages. Such provisions are often found in sections with the heading “Limitation of Liability.” Seeing as I’m not a fan of the word limitation (see this post), I’m experimenting with … Read More
Transactions: The Tennessee Journal of Business Law has just published my book-review essay Dysfunction in Contract Drafting: The Causes and a Cure. (Go here for a PDF copy.) It’s a critique of the book The Three and a Half Minute Transaction: Boilerplate and the Limits of Contract Design, by Mitu Gulati and Robert E. Scott. I know what you’re thinking: “Law … Read More
I’m pleased that this fall I’ll be teaching at Notre Dame Law School. Well, really this summer—the course will be three weeks long and will start August 18, a week before classes normally start. What makes this a particularly good arrangement for me is that it will be an intensive course, with an entire semester’s worth of learning crammed into … Read More
In this post from a few days ago, you’ll see that some tenacious readers and I have been going at it hammer and tongs, debating what (if anything) to use instead of with respect to in various contexts. Everyone seems to agree that in most contexts one can be more economical than with respect to. So our debate has focused … Read More
Thanks to this post on Peter A. Mahler’s New York Business Divorce blog, I learned that in a recent opinion of the New York Supreme Court (despite the name, a lower court), a judge considered the implications of either … or. I wasn’t about to let that pass without chiming in—regular readers will know that I have a thing about … Read More
After last Thursday’s “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar in Dallas for West LegalEdcenter, I had the pleasure of having dinner with longtime reader and commenter Chris Lemens. He asked me about with respect to. This one’s for you, Chris. According to Garner’s Modern American Usage, “The phrases with respect to and in respect of are usually best replaced by single prepositions.” … Read More
