Archive for January, 2010
Thursday, January 28th, 2010
The following oddity from a reader: When is an amendment not an amendment? When it’s a separate agreement! From the introductory paragraph of a supplier’s attachment to another agreement: IMPLEMENTATION ASSISTANCE AMENDMENT NUMBER ONE TO BASIC LICENSE AGREEMENT NUMBER [redacted] CUSTOMER: [redacted] This Amendment, together with the terms and conditions contained int he Basic License [...]
Posted in Front and Back of the Contract | 1 Comment »
Wednesday, January 27th, 2010
Chadwick Busk of The Fine Print blog told me about this item on Lexology (free registration required) by Patrick T. Sharkey of Jackson Walker LLP. I hope Patrick doesn’t mind if I quote extensively from it: A recent Texas Supreme Court decision highlights the importance of thoughtful drafting. In Intercontinental Group Partnership v. KP Home [...]
Posted in Defined Terms | 9 Comments »
Wednesday, January 27th, 2010
Yesterday I spent the day at West’s headquarters in Eagan, Minnesota, with a dozen or so journalists and bloggers being introduced to WestlawNext, the next generation of Westlaw. More about that next week, when WestlawNext is launched. But kicking the tires of WestlawNext caused me to consider how computer-assisted legal research is used in contract [...]
Posted in Process | 4 Comments »
Saturday, January 23rd, 2010
In chapter 15 of MSCD and in this May 2007 post (which has attracted 32 comments) I explain why using ragged right margins makes word-processing documents easier to read. It’s a no-brainer—you may think that full justification looks “professional,” but typography experts are unanimously in favor of ragged right for word-processing documents. (Books and other [...]
Posted in Typography | 25 Comments »
Friday, January 22nd, 2010
Via Twitter, I came across a blog post entitled “Effective Contract Drafting: A Subversive Manifesto.” It’s by William Carleton, partner at a Seattle law firm. It begins as follows: It’s always best to say what you mean as clearly and as simply as you can, right? Maybe. … Ambiguity, however, is indispensable to the drafter [...]
Posted in Ambiguity | 5 Comments »
Thursday, January 21st, 2010
If you’re the sort who routinely rummages in the entrails of commercial contracts, you might well find of interest D.C. Toedt’s website On Technology Contracts. D.C. Toedt (pronounced “Tate”) is a business lawyer with an intellectual-property and software-law background. He’s in private practice in Houston; I owe him a debt of gratitude for having introduced [...]
Posted in Odds and Ends | 1 Comment »
Thursday, January 21st, 2010
Yesterday I gave another of my Osgoode Professional Development seminars in Toronto, to a sellout crowd of eighty. During a break I discussed with one of the participants what to call the components of the body of the contract. In a follow-up email, here’s what she had to say on the subject: As discussed, in [...]
Posted in Layout | 7 Comments »
Thursday, January 14th, 2010
“Definedtermitis” is a condition caused by excessive reliance on defined terms. It causes clogging of the arteries of your contracts. Those who succumb to it are referred to as “definedtermites.” Consider an email I received today from a reader: OK, so I thought it was a typo, but it turns out it was intentional. I [...]
Posted in Defined Terms | 9 Comments »
Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
It’s not only transactional types who are interested in contract language. If you want to see how a different online ecosystem approaches the subject, I suggest you have a look at this post on Language Log and the related comments. I like to think that I stand somewhere between the linguists and the lawyers. It’s [...]
Posted in Odds and Ends | 4 Comments »
Tuesday, January 12th, 2010
Rarely do I have occasion to offer thoughts on drafting under article 2 of the Uniform Commercial Code, which applies to sales of goods. Here are two warranty disclaimers from some equipment purchase agreements I’ve been reviewing: NO OTHER WARRANTY TO CUSTOMER FROM SELLER IS EXPRESS OR IMPLIED. SELLER SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF [...]
Posted in Select Provisions | 9 Comments »
Monday, January 11th, 2010
Today I had occasion to consider use of the phrase in particular in contracts. Here are some examples, taken from the SEC’s EDGAR system: The Company has taken all reasonable steps to maintain the confidentiality of or otherwise protect and enforce its rights in its confidential information, in particular the trade secrets owned by the [...]
Posted in Select Usages | 2 Comments »
Friday, January 8th, 2010
I’m looking for caselaw or commentary on the following issue relating to the parts of a mergers-and-acquisitions contract. If a buyer wants to address in an M&A contract circumstances that are under the seller’s control—for example, whether the seller is in good standing under Delaware law—it would make sense to do so by means of [...]
Posted in M&A | 6 Comments »
Monday, January 4th, 2010
Today I saw the following in a contract I pulled from the SEC’s EDGAR system: SunPower hereby guarantees that, subject to Section 22, it shall supply and deliver each of the Products to the delivery point specified in a given Purchase Order (each, a Delivery Point ) on or prior to the scheduled delivery date [...]
Posted in Categories of Contract Language, Select Usages | No Comments »
Monday, January 4th, 2010
Currently on my nighttable is Gods at War: Shotgun Takeovers, Government by Deal, and the Private Equity Implosion, by Steven Davidoff. Steven is a professor at the University of Connecticut Law School (click here for his faculty bio page) and is the New York Times’s “Deal Professor.” Before teaching, he practiced for ten years with [...]
Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment »