Month: July 2013

“This Agreement Contemplates”

I sometimes get from unexpected quarters ideas for new bits of contract language for to me ponder. Last week, my web designer, the inestimable Selene Bowlby of iDesign Studios, asked me about the phrase “this agreement contemplates,” which she had seen in a contract for web-design services. An astronomer contemplates the universe. An existentialist contemplates being and nothingness. I contemplate … Read More

The MSCD Ebook: I Attempt to Get the Story Straight

[Updated July 19, 2013] In this recent post I grandly announced that the ebook version of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting was available on iTunes, but it later transpired that pretty much everything I had to say on the subject was wrong. I don’t hold that against myself or anyone else—when it comes to law books, this ebook … Read More

“To the Best of Its Ability”

Here are three instances, from EDGAR, of use of the phrase to the best of its [or his, her, or their] ability: The Company hereby engages the Consultant, and the Consultant hereby agrees to serve the Company to the best of his ability to provide financial advisory services to the Company during the Term (as defined below) as and when … Read More

“Every Effort”

Today I was reminded of the phrase every effort. I mention it in this 2004 article, but not in MSCD. Here’s an example from EDGAR: The Investment Manager represents that it shall make every effort to ensure that the Fund continuously qualifies as a Regulated Investment Company under Subchapter M of the Code or any successor provision. This phrase serves as a reminder of … Read More

Evidence for Continued Overuse of “Shall” in the Twenty-Third Century

While trawling the far reaches of the Netflix galaxy, I encountered that fixture of the Western canon, Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan. I leave it to others to explore the glories of this oeuvre. What caught my attention is what happens at 54:00. Spock’s protege Saavik (below) reminds Admiral Kirk of General Order 15: No flag officer shall … Read More

Terms of Art That Can’t Be Replaced

I recently saw the following on Twitter: Do you think there are legalisms (terms of art) that cannot be replaced with plain language? We’re making a list: http://t.co/Hd0ZLidJK7 — Cheryl Stephens (@CherylStephens) June 20, 2013 It prompted me to think, Hey, that’s a great idea! Why don’t I ask my readers to help compile a list of contract terms of … Read More

The Connection Between Revising the Content of Your Templates and Automating Them

In two recent posts I considered the merits of overhauling the language of your template commercial contracts (here) and the merits of automating them (here). But it’s important to consider that those tasks apply to different parts of the process. Automation allows you to prepare first drafts faster and with greater control that is possible using the traditional copy-and-paste approach. By … Read More

A Variant of “Part Versus the Whole” Ambiguity

Joshua Stein (I mentioned him today’s other post) recently asked me about an instance of contract ambiguity. Here’s how he referred to it in a recent email: Here’s an example of the usage I commented on: “If Member A fails to contribute the entire Mandatory Capital Contribution, then Member B shall have the following rights and remedies.” What happens if … Read More

Joshua Stein on Defined Terms

I’d made many new professional friends through A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting, but never new family members. So recently I was delighted to receive an email from a reader who announced that not only did he “hugely appreciate” the book, he was also related to me—he was my second cousin once removed. More specifically, my reader’s great-grandfather was … Read More