Go here to see Top Ten Tips in Drafting and Negotiating International Contracts, co-authored by me and René Mario Scherr, Tetra Pak’s Regional General Counsel, South Asia, East Asia & Oceania. If that link doesn’t work for you, go here for a PDF. You’re welcome. I met René about seven years ago, at one of my seminars. We’ve kept in … Read More
Last night I saw the following tweet from @kemitchell: @KonciseD Can I sub "now assigns" or "presently assigns" for "hereby assigns" to exclude the habitual? Matter how the K is dated? MSCD 3.20 — Kyle E. Mitchell (@kemitchell) April 27, 2015 Ah, variants on a category of contract language, namely language of performance! Here’s the relevant bit of MSCD 3.20: … Read More
There I was, innocently looking at the form certificate of amendment kindly made available by the Delaware Secretary of State (here), when the concluding clause caught my eye: It contains a number of usages worthy of comment, but what grabbed my attention was the “A.D.” placed before the blank for the year. Is it possible that someone might be confused as to whether … Read More
This August I’ll be at Notre Dame Law School again, teaching a three-week intensive course in contract drafting. As always, the course will feature a series of written assignments. The first assignment is gentle, to ease my students into the subject. The scenario is that a senior lawyer asks a junior lawyer to revise a given draft to reflect a new deal term. I … Read More
The corner of Twitter that’s interested in English usage has recently been all aflutter over that popular topic, they used as a singular pronoun, as in “If a patron doesn’t like the opera, they are free to leave.” It seems to have been sparked by this Wall Street Journal article by @bgzimmer. The article suggests that copy editors are increasingly willing to accept … Read More
I saw this tweet a couple of days ago: Tonight's legal drafting music is Daenerys Targaryen's theme music. Haunting stuff, melancholy contract drafting. https://t.co/yIANVTHEUV — Jas Purewal (@gamerlaw) April 20, 2015 It prompted the following thoughts: Do you listen to music while drafting? If so, what do you listen to? I don’t, at least not while engaged in the task. … Read More
Reader Estela Mora Alfonsín sent me the following request: I am writing to ask if you could shed some light on the usage of the expression (apparently very frequent in legal writing) “regard shall be had”. Honestly, I have not seen it in many contexts but one of my teachers at the translation course I am taking insists in us … Read More
In this recent post, I considered as stated in as an alternative to in accordance with and found it wanting. But in this comment, A. Wright Burke proposed that under “is the better choice.” So he has thrown down the gauntlet; I accept the challenge, at the risk of having to run the gantlet. Below are eight instances of in … Read More
Last week I was in Zurich. I was there to do an in-house “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar on Tuesday for ABB, the global engineering company, followed by public seminars on Wednesday and Thursday. But I arrived on Monday, in time for the Sechseläuten, Zurich’s spring festival. I was staying in Oerlikon, where ABB’s offices are, but on Monday afternoon I took the train … Read More
Two recent exchanges have led me to consider that when it comes to seeking simplicity in the language of business contracts, one can reach a point of diminishing returns. “In Accordance With” A couple of weeks ago, a reader mentioned in an email to me that he prefers as stated in over in accordance with, as being less legalistic and shorter. … Read More
