Periodically I inflict on you my musings regarding notices-provisions terminology. (See this August 2009 AdamsDrafting blog post on why I’ve opted for “national transportation company,” and see this March 2009 AdamsDrafting blog post on why I refer to “fax.”) Well, it’s now time for me to address another such cataclysmic issue. I’ve never been crazy about the phrase “personal delivery.” … Read More
In this post at Adam Smith, Esq., Bruce MacEwen—I assume it’s Bruce—riffs on a couple of articles in the U.K. periodical Law Week, this one asking “Does the global law model help or hinder the top-level adviser?” and this one asking “Do big personalities exist at law firms?” These articles, and Bruce’s piece, consider the notion that law firms are limiting their recruitment … Read More
West and I have set the 2011 dates for my “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminars: March 10: Philadephia, PA April 6: Tampa, FL (new location) May 4: Chicago, IL June 9: Morristown, NJ (new location) September 15: Boston, MA October 12: Minneapolis, MN October 25: Washington, D.C. November 2: New York, NY December [6, 7, or 8: TBD]: Santa Clara, CA … Read More
I’ll be doing my “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar for Osgoode Professional Development in Ottawa on Monday, March 7, 2011 and in Toronto on Wednesday, May 11, 2011. Go here for more information. This will be my second time in Ottawa. As for Toronto, for a while now I’ve been doing two sold-out seminars a year, with around eighty people in … Read More
A standard element of confidentiality agreements is exclusions from the definition of “Confidential Information.” They’re sufficiently inevitable that longtime reader Michael Fleming refers to them as “The Four Romanettes®.” I’ve been mulling over one of them, the exclusion for information that becomes public. Actually, that’s just one way of phrasing it. Here’s a range of alternatives: information that is or becomes … Read More
In an evaluation submitted after one of my recent speaking engagements, someone complained about how I “shamelessly” plugged my book. And in an evaluation submitted after a recent seminar, someone said, with respect to my one-minute explanation of Koncision, “Could do without the sales pitch for his company!” Given that those probably won’t be the last complaints I hear about … Read More
This April 2009 AdamsDrafting blog post is about giving notice by email. From comments to that post I learned about RPost’s Registered Email service, and I quickly added to that post an update about RPost. I’ve decided that RPost’s service adds sufficient value that I want to include it as an option in Koncision products. More specifically, when Koncision customers … Read More
I’ve switched my blogging home from this blog to The Koncise Drafter. So if you subscribe to the RSS feed for this blog, you might want to unsubscribe and go here to subscribe to the RSS feed for The Koncise Drafter. Same pointy-headed contract stuff, different URL!
I’ve noticed that in most one-way confidentiality agreements, the disclosing party is listed first in the introductory clause. That prompted me to speculate whether in other kinds of contracts there’s a generally accepted order in which the parties are listed in the introductory clause. On the other hand, there’s the urge to put your client, or your company, first. That … Read More
Via this post on the Delaware Corporate and Commercial Litigation Blog I learned of an opinion that the Delaware Court of Chancery issued last month. The case is Ion Geophysical Corp. v. Fletcher International, Ltd., C.A. No. 5050-VCP; go here for a copy of the decision. Section 6(b) of a stock purchase agreement between ION and Fletcher laid out a notice … Read More
