Making a Test Part of “Masterclass”? For Companies, Sure, But Probably Not for the Public Version of the Course

In this blog post I display the digital badge I’m implementing for my course Drafting Clearer Contracts: Masterclass. I explain that the digital credentials aren’t intended to indicate a level of competence. Instead, they’re intended to start a conversation.

The course already includes quizzes; the issue under discussion now is whether to add to self-assessment the kind of assessment that is presented to the world. Sure, I could include a test as part of Masterclass. To get digital credentials, you would have to achieve a score that suggests a basic level of competence. Or I could have two tiers of digital credentials, one for those who have taken and passed the test, the other for everyone else. I noticed that the free M&A Boot Camp run by Hogan Lovells includes a test; Hogan Lovells doesn’t want you to put the course on your resume unless you’ve passed the test.

But I’m not inclined to do that sort of thing for public series of Masterclass. I don’t think individuals who pay for the privilege of taking the course would respond well to a two-tier structure. It would add an edge to the proceedings. (As it is, plenty of people don’t even like the idea of being called on.) And there would seem to be a negligible difference between having no test and having one aimed at checking that someone has been paying attention.

Requiring some level of participation as a condition to getting credentials would also be problematic. Yes, the course is built on participation, and I’ll make a point of periodically reminding everyone of that. But there will always be some who are active and others who are passive. And I don’t want to add to my responsibilities by having to keep track of who spoke up and who didn’t.

And given that participants can watch a recording of any session they missed, I’m not inclined to withhold digital credentials from people who aren’t present for a given number of sessions.

Does that in effect make my digital credentials a trophy you get even if you don’t engage? Even if you don’t show up all the time? Well, yes, that’s exactly what they are. They’re an invitation to an interesting conversation. I think that’s enough.

But in-house series of Masterclass are a different matter. If a company or a law firm pays for the privilege of running one or more series of Masterclass for its people, it’s welcome to set the rules, so it would be free to ask that I administer a test at the end of the course. And it could ask that I share the results with them.

I know that organizations like being able to measure the effect of training. Well, I can now offer that as an option. But everyone would still get a badge!

(All this is new, so I welcome your thoughts. Oh, and regarding the image at the top of this post, it’s from this video clip.)

About the author

Ken Adams is the leading authority on how to say clearly whatever you want to say in a contract. He’s author of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting, and he offers online and in-person training around the world. He’s also chief content officer of LegalSifter, Inc., a company that combines artificial intelligence and expertise to assist with review of contracts.

1 thought on “Making a Test Part of “Masterclass”? For Companies, Sure, But Probably Not for the Public Version of the Course”

  1. hi Ken, I would welcome some form of accreditation from attending this course whereby I would be expected to submit an assignment of a contract redraft and/ or answer multiple questions. It is too easy to just attend. It may-well be that you get a certificate from attending – following a basic test – and a more advanced test is assigned for practitioner status. I accept this may increase the cost – and as a self funder – I would still welcome it. I am enjoying the training thus far but I need to step up my reading and assignments to get more out of this very worthwhile and practical course. If you don’t put the effort it you will get little from it.


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.