Blog

Law Reviews and Prestige Whoring

Having written an article on represents and warrants, I had to find a home for it. That caused me to consider again the whole business of submitting articles to journals run by law-school students. It also caused me to consider the significance attributed to publishing in law reviews. A Prestige-Driven System Academics have long groused about law reviews. As far … Read More

Dates for U.S. 2015 “Drafting Clearer Contracts” Seminars

The dates and cities for my 2015 public “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminars in the U.S. for West LegalEdcenter have been on the “Public Seminars” page of this site for a few weeks, but I thought it best to make that information a little more conspicuous. So here it is: OPEN FOR REGISTRATION April 2, 2015, Nashville, TN May 7, 2015, Chicago, … Read More

Reminder: Zurich Seminars

My 15 April and 16 April “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminars in Zurich are fast approaching. They will be my only seminars in Continental Europe this year. For more information, go here.

Do We Care About Default Remedies?

You might recall that one of the rationales for use of the phrase represents and warrants is that it allows you to specify what remedies are available, namely an action under the contract for breach of warranty, a tort action for misrepresentation, or both. In an as-yet-unpublished article, I demonstrate that using represents or warrants or both doesn’t make sense. I go on to … Read More

Some Shortcomings of Live CLE Webcasts

Recently I was on the panel for a live webcast—you know, with panelists joining in by telephone and everyone looking at PowerPoint slides on their screens. I didn’t exactly cover myself with glory. Partway through, the battery on my cordless phone expired—thankfully not while I was speaking. I thought it would be safest to call back in on an ancient … Read More

“Knowingly”

At my recent “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar in San Francisco, a participant asked me what I thought of use of the phrase knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally in waivers of jury trial, as in the following EDGAR example (I converted it from all caps to spare you having your eyeballs explode): The borrowers hereby knowingly, voluntarily, intentionally and irrevocably waive all … Read More

Is There a Downside to Automated Contract Creation?

If you think of yourself as a committed member of the digerati, The Glass Cage: Automation and Us, by Nicholas Carr, might give you pause. Carr shows that as much as automation enriches our lives, it can also impoverish. For example, he describes how all-encompassing flight automation appears to have resulted in a “deskilling” of pilots, leading to a new type of aviation … Read More

So You’re “Hosed” If You Use Older Lawyers for Your Contracts?

Here’s the opening of this Gigaom story, by Stacey Higginbotham: One of the biggest roadblock to adopting the public cloud for Rich Roseman, former CIO at 21st Century Fox had nothing to do with bandwidth, vendor-lock in or security. It had to do with lawyers. Specifically, old lawyers who couldn’t adapt their contracts to the new world of the cloud. … Read More

“Shall Seek”

Welcome to shall seek, yet another unhelpful alternative to saying that a party has to use reasonable efforts to accomplish something. With shall seek, you’re saying that someone has to try to do whatever it is, but you don’t provide a standard. In each of the following examples from EDGAR, I’d use instead reasonable efforts: When placing such orders, the … Read More

“Promises That” and “Promises To”

For the sheer heck of it, let’s look at how the verb promises is used in contracts. Here are two examples from EDGAR of promises that: Executive agrees and expressly promises that, during the Prohibited Period, Executive shall not directly or indirectly (i) recruit, solicit or induce any employee, consultant, or independent contractor of the Parent Company or any of its Subsidiaries … Read More