It’s clear from reader feedback that I need to do a better job of explaining myself. Here goes: It’s pointless and confusing to use in contracts the phrases represents and warrants and representations and warranties because … Because my informal inquiries indicate that most lawyers treat the elements of those phrases as synonyms, much as they do the two elements … Read More
On the website of the state bar of Wisconsin I came across an article entitled “Backdating Documents: Not Necessarily the Stuff of Scandal.” It contains the following passage: Drafting and executing a document after an event occurs, but in a manner that accurately reflects the date on which the event transpired, is a permissible form of backdating. This is backdating … Read More
While reading Lorne & Bryan’s discussion of representations and warranties I encountered the following statement: Similarly, there should never be any objection to “representations” being made to the best of the knowledge of a party (as opposed to “to the knowledge” of a party, a phrase that is at best ambiguous and at worst contrary to what appears to be … Read More
In this post on his licensinghandbook.com blog, Jeffrey Gordon suggests that lawyers should consider the value that contract specialists can bring to the contract process. That got me to wondering whether any such contract specialist would have to be a lawyer. In other words, if a nonlawyer works on a contract, does that constitute the authorized practice of law? I’m not about … Read More
[Updated Sept. 20 12:30 p.m. EDT: I realized that I needed to provide a more succinct version of my analysis. If that’s what you’re looking for, check out this blog item, which I just posted.] I’ve previously explained why the phrases representations and warranties and represents and warrants are pointless and confusing. And that applies whatever the governing law. My … Read More
The August 2009 issue of The Business Lawyer contains a great article by Glenn D. West and W. Benton Lewis, Jr. of Weil Gotshal entitled “Contracting to Avoid Extra-Contractual Liability—Can Your Contractual Deal Ever Really Be the ‘Entire’ Deal?.” Click here for a copy. Glenn is getting into the habit of writing articles that are essential reading for anyone looking … Read More
As part of their ambitious Legal Rebels project, the ABA Journal has named me one of their fifty “Legal Rebels.” They’ve been rolling out profiles of their Legal Rebels, and they’ve now posted mine; click here to go to it. Rebellion isn’t something that usually comes to mind when I think of the American Bar Association, but I commend Ed Adams … Read More
For all my dwelling on relating to, I haven’t considered at what point something might be too remote to a given circumstance to be related to it. That, of course, is a fact-driven issue that isn’t susceptible to generalization. But it can be useful to consider examples, and Vickie Pynchon provides one in this post on her Settle It Now … Read More
In this April 2009 post I solicited submissions from any company interested in taking part in this semester’s Penn Law redrafting project. But then I had a change of heart—why not invite a not-for-profit organization to take part? So we’re going to be redrafting a trademark license agreement that The Breast Cancer Research Foundation enters into with its corporate alliance … Read More
I was recently reminded of this article on the role of contract managers, as well as this follow-up article prompted by the recession. Both were written by Tim Cummins of the International Association for Contract and Commercial Management (IACCM). These articles caught my eye because my public seminars and my in-house seminars at companies are attended by both lawyers and contract … Read More
