Blog

After a Certain Point, You Shouldn’t Make Contracts Any Less Complex

Above is my first graph in Word, and it sure looks like it. But rather than spend any more time fiddling with it, I’m going with it as is: it’s adequate to make my simple point. It’s not the case that contract value and contract complexity both start at zero and increase proportionately. Instead, contracts want to default to a … Read More

Conflicting Provisions: Seeking Examples

You’re drafting a contract, as you’re in the habit of doing. You include a waiver of jury trial, for whatever reason. And you make California law the governing law. Or maybe Georgia law. Well, for purposes of trials in state court, courts in California and Georgia have held that pre-litigation waivers of jury trial are unenforceable. See Grafton Partners, L.P. … Read More

Should You Include a Duck in Your Draft Contract?

Over dinner recently, a transactional lawyer told me he makes a point of including a duck in each draft he sends to the other side. But he didn’t actually use the word “duck.” That’s my word, thanks to the great Alex Hamilton, who pointed me to this post on the Coding Horror blog, which includes the following definition of duck: … Read More

Use and Abuse of “Not Less Than” and Its Variants in References to Time

ContractsProf Blog has an interesting post by Stacey Lantagne (aka @StaceyLantagne) about a court case involving the phrase for a period of not less than X years. Here’s Stacey: The dispute concerned a noncompete between a dance studio and Marik, one of its employees. The covenant not to compete stated that Marik wouldn’t engage in any similar business “for a … Read More

The Texas Supreme Court Doesn’t Like Cryptic Contracts

Thanks to Glenn West, I learned about the recent opinion of the Texas Supreme Court in Burlington Resources Oil & Gas Co. LP v. Texas Crude Energy, LLC (PDF here). The fight was over a technical oil-and-gas issue that’s way above my pay grade. Both parties claimed the language was unambiguous and each offered a vastly different interpretation. The court … Read More

London “Drafting Clearer Contracts” Seminar on 4 November 2019

I’m pleased that on Monday, 4 November 2019, I’ll once more be doing a “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar in London, hosted by UCL Faculty of Laws. For more information, go here. And go here for feedback from participants at the 2014 seminar. While I’m at it, here’s a grab-bag of stuff with an English nexus: Go here for the Law Society … Read More

Contract Review, Meet Contract Drafting

After almost a year working on the factory floor at LegalSifter, it has become clear to me that contract review and contract drafting are closely allied functions. … This post is on LegalSifter’s blog. To read the rest of it, go here.

Of “Hereof and Thereof”: The Third Circuit Makes Stuff Up

Via Dave Hoffman (aka @HoffProf) I learned of this post by Matthew Stiegler (aka @CA3blog). It involves and and or, so you know it’s headache-inducing. I won’t attempt to set the scene. Instead, let’s cut to the chase. Matthew’s post involves the Third Circuit’s recent decision in Sköld v. Galderma Labs. Here’s the court quoting the contract provision at issue: The … Read More

An Update on LegalSifter

Last April I told you in this post that I had become an advisor to LegalSifter, the company that’s developing software to help you review the other side’s draft contracts. What do I have to announce now? Well, nothing in particular. I’m simply continuing to do my part. In addition to doing consulting work, and roaming around giving seminars, and hacking away at … Read More

“City of Contracts” Podcast with Sarah Carlin of Hire Counsel

Go here for my podcast with Sarah Carlin, Director of Recruiting at Hire Counsel, a national leader in legal staffing. Like the blurb says: Ken and Sarah discuss how Hire Counsel helps companies with their contracts process, and what the work of a contract manager consists of on a daily basis. They discuss the backgrounds that make for a successful … Read More