Blog

Perhaps the First and Last Generative-AI Image I Publish

A week ago I created, for the first time, an illustration using generative AI—more specifically, Dall-E. It’s the illustration accompanying this post. Yes, it’s of an unhappy robot. In a spaceship. Sitting on a toilet. It’s puerile, but in my defense, I did it on a whim. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Dall-E is amazing, but I expect that this is the last time … Read More

One Contract, A Lot of “Efforts” Inconsistency

I plucked from the SEC’s EDGAR system, largely at random, an asset purchase agreement filed earlier this month. It was drafted by a big law firm [updated 11 January 2025: the firm in question is Allen & Overy], and it contained, along with the usual dysfunction, some glitches that caught my eye. In particular, here are the different efforts (and … Read More

Becoming an Informed Consumer of Contract Language: It’s Challenging

I’m doing a private series of Drafting Clearer Contracts: Masterclass for a group from a global company. We’re three-quarters of the way through, so last week I checked in with my contact at the company to see how they were faring. Here’s what he said in his email back: I solicited input from a couple of folks, in particular those … Read More

“Drafting Clearer Contracts” Training for 2024

I’ve scheduled Drafting Clearer Contracts training for the first half of 2024. I’m doing the following public series of Drafting Clearer Contracts: Masterclass (eight weekly hourlong sessions, supplemented by reading and quizzes): Masterclass (37) was scheduled at the request of a client who wanted their Singapore personnel to participate in Masterclass, but it’s open to all. Someone in California has … Read More

On Being Cited

Last week readers told me I was cited by the Delaware Court of Chancery in MALT Family Trust v. 777 Partners LLC. The topic wasn’t anything too exciting—the meaning of notwithstanding. A little more notable was the U.S. Solicitor General citing me a couple of months ago in their brief in Pulsifer v. U.S. (here). I was aware of the … Read More

The State of the Blog

You might have heard that I have a new blog, the Adams Contracts blog. It’s on the website of a new business, called … Adams Contracts. It’s a division of LegalSifter; we’re building automated contract templates. For more about Adams Contracts, go to our website, at www.adamscontracts.com. So, two blogs, and two spheres of activity. Here’s how I see this … Read More

The Syntactic Ambiguity Lurking in the Name of a Flavor of Ben & Jerry’s Ice Cream

You know you’re suitably paranoid about the potential for confusion in contract language if you spot instances of that sort of confusion in your everyday life. Yesterday I was in urgent need of ice-cream therapy, so I got me a pint of the Ben & Jerry’s flavor (previously unknown to me) called “Salted Caramel Brownie.” Here’s the fine-print description: Vanilla … Read More

The Texas Supreme Court Misunderstands Aspects of Syntactic Ambiguity: U.S. Polyco, Inc. v. Texas Central Business Lines Corp.

Tipster extraordinaire Glenn West let me know about the Texas Supreme Court’s opinion in U.S. Polyco, Inc. v. Texas Central Business Lines Corp., issued yesterday (here). Here’s the language at issue (emphasis added): 1.1 TCB Infrastructure Improvements. As used in this Agreement: “TCB Infrastructure Improvements” will mean the following improvements agreed to and shown generally in Exhibit X attached and … Read More

“Material” Is Ambiguous. That’s Big News

I’m pleased to be able to make available my law review article The Word Material Is Ambiguous in Contracts, Why That’s a Problem, and How to Fix It. It’s in Scribes Journal of Legal Writing; go here for a copy. (The issue in which it appears hasn’t yet been published, but these days no one waits for that.) Use of … Read More

The Challenge of Addressing Your Client’s Needs

Andrew Stokes is CEO of The Law Machine, “a contracting platform that makes contract content modular so lawyers can automate contracts visually through a drag and drop UI.” I enjoy Andrew’s posts. I noticed his two most recent posts. In this one, he gripes about the notion of “market” contract terms: If ever again a $1000/hour lawyer dares tell me … Read More