Apparently there’s no I in team. And there’s no objective and subjective in use and interpretation of efforts provisions. When I ask seminar participants to tell me the difference between best efforts and reasonable efforts, it’s routine for someone to suggest that the former represents an objective standard and the latter a subjective standard, or vice versa. That question is in … Read More
You’ve prepared a contract that imposes on Acme an obligation to use reasonable efforts to sell Widgets. If you leave it at that, a fight could arise at any time over whether Acme has used reasonable efforts. You could add to the deal by saying that you may terminate if Acme doesn’t reach stated sales targets. That would give you … Read More
So we know the following about efforts provisions: It makes sense to use efforts to express an obligation if the party under the obligation doesn’t have complete control over achieving the desired result. Contract parties also use efforts obligations as an expedient alternative to stating precisely what a party under an obligation has to do to achieve the desired result. … Read More
When it comes to my computing needs, what’s most distinctive isn’t that I write stuff, or that I have websites and a blog, or that I record the occasional webinar. Instead, it’s that I roam the world giving PowerPoint presentations as part of my “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminars, with my presentations featuring extracts of contract text on which I scribble … Read More
On 7 November I’ll be doing another “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar for University College London Faculty of Laws. Once registration information is available online, I’ll announce it on this blog. If you’re bemused by the idea of an American-trained lawyer parachuting in to provide training in contract drafting, you might want to check out these articles, each from an English publication: The Problem … Read More
In this comment, longtime reader Vance Koven suggests using Acme shall seek to instead of Acme shall use reasonable efforts to. He says that they’re equivalent, in that any court would apply a reasonableness standard to an obligation stated using seek. I understand Vance’s point. In fact, I’m going to go further. Why use the somewhat dated and literary seek? … Read More
Although I’m committed to helping anyone who’s interested become an informed consumer of contract language, I think it’s self-evident that automated contract creation is the most effective way to scale rigorous contract language. That’s why I continue to discuss automation with my clients. Some of you might recall that my software of choice is ContractExpress. That remains the case even though … Read More
Two people I enjoy following on Twitter are Kyle Mitchell (@kemitchell) and Ansel Halliburton (@anseljh). They’re half my age and twice my technical sophistication, they’re interested in contracts, and they throw around ideas that largely go over my head but certainly seem ambitious. Here’s Ansel’s latest idea: Updated some *very early* thoughts about what Simplified Legal English could look like. Comments? … Read More
In this 2015 post I suggested that “instead of addressing each deal point in a separate sentence, you can often consolidate them.” When you do that, instead of using two main verbs to cover two deal points, you need only one main verb. But the example I used to illustrate this point ended up being hijacked by a substantive issue. … Read More
Note use of the Latinism prima facie in following provisions, which I extracted from EDGAR without anaesthesia: The Finnvera Facility Agent shall maintain in its books at the Finnvera Facility Agency Branch a record of the Term Loan attesting as to the total of the Borrower’s indebtedness to the Tranche A Lenders. These accounts or registers shall constitute, in the … Read More
