• Home
  • About
    • Credentials
    • Press
  • Training
    • Masterclass
    • Webcourse
    • Seminars
  • Writing
    • A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting
    • The Structure of M&A Contracts
    • Articles
  • Blog
  • Resources
    • Layout Templates
    • The Numbering Assistant
  • Contact

Adams on Contract Drafting

Revisiting “Sole” and “Exclusive” Yet Again

Posted on July 14, 2015 by Ken Adams

Recently I expressed to a group of patent lawyers my reluctance to use sole and exclusive in granting language to indicate that the licensor retains or doesn’t retain, respectively, the right to use the intellectual property.

But on revisiting MSCD 13.606–10 and this 2012 post, I realized that I haven’t yet offered suitable alternatives. So here goes:

In contracts on EDGAR, the most popular alternative to sole is exclusive (except as to the Licensor). But given the inconsistency among commentators regarding the meaning of sole (see MSCD and the 2012 post), I suggest that it would be prudent to be clearer still and say exclusive (subject to the Licensor’s continued right to use X).

Instead of exclusive, you could say exclusive (even as to the Licensor). But even serves to emphasize something surprising or extreme. Contracts aren’t the place for emphasis, and this use of even involves nothing surprising or extreme. So I say the heck with even—use instead exclusive (including as to the Licensor).

Any thoughts?

Posted in Selected Usages 3 Comments

Search

Connect

  • Email
  • Google+
  • LinkedIn
  • Twitter

Subscribe

  • RSS Feed
  • Newsletter
  • LinkedIn Group
LegalSifter – a new Standard of Care

Categories

Archives

Work with M&A contracts?

Drafting Clearer Contracts Seminars

Kenneth A. Adams | Adams on Contract Drafting
© 2021 Kenneth A. Adams | kadams@adamsdrafting.com | Privacy Policy | (516) 318-6956