On July 17 I’ll be in Seattle giving my West Legalworks seminar. Afterwards, starting at 5:00 p.m., I’ll be meeting a few friends for drinks at the restaurant Sazerac, at 1101 Fourth Avenue, at the corner of Spring Street. It’s a few blocks from the Grand Hyatt, where the seminar is being held. If you’re in the area and have some … Read More
Maybe it’s sunspots. Or something in the water. At any rate, another second edition of a book related to contract drafting has just been published. This time it’s Charles Fox’s Working with Contracts: What Law School Doesn’t Teach You. (Click here to go to the Amazon page. Note that Amazon’s a little confused, in that the cover image on display is that … Read More
Normally I wouldn’t dream of going public with thoughts on writing in general. A vast number of people have busied themselves with that topic, so there’s no chance of my having anything novel to say. I regularly give thanks to the gods of writing that I’ve been given the near-virgin territory of contract drafting to explore. But I’ll tell you … Read More
Once in a long while I see a template contract that uses Word’s line-numbering feature to include line numbering in the left margin of each page. The idea, obviously, it to allow anyone involved in drafting or negotiating a contract based on the template to pinpoint language at issue—Let’s strike the word “material” on page 46, line 12. That’s a laudable … Read More
I said in this blog post that I planned to do a post about Deal Proof. Well, here it is. Deal Proof is a Thomson West product; click here to go to the relevant page of the Thomson West website. It’s a document-analysis and proofreading tool that many of the big firms subscribe to. It checks for inconsistent use of … Read More
FYI, I’ll be on the panel for a CLE session at the ABA 2008 annual meeting, which is being held in New York. The topic is “Getting the Business Deal into the Contract—Choosing the Right Words.” It’s being held at 2:30 p.m. on Friday, August 8. Also on the panel will be Tina Stark, professor at Emory Law School and … Read More
In this post I described how I had heard someone cite by name some companies and one law firm—a multi-office U.S. law firm—that had foresworn use of shall. Well, recently I had the privilege of giving a series of seminars at that law firm, and I was tickled to be able to ask two senior corporate partners whether their firm … Read More
If you say that something has to be satisfactory to Acme, the standard might be an objective one, in that it would be met if a reasonable person in Acme’s position would be satisfied. Alternatively, it could mean that Acme actually has to be satisfied, subject only to the implied duty of good faith—the standard is a subjective one. The … Read More
Law firms could take a number of steps to put their contract drafting on a more rational footing. They could adopt a contract-drafting “house style” that recommends usages to employ and usages to steer clear of. They could offer rigorous training. And they could implement a centralized template initiative, maybe even one that makes use of document-assembly technology. But in … Read More
West Legalworks would like me to do webinars for them. I’m open to the idea. I could do a series based on MSCD—maybe eight one-hour webinars. They’d be done live and then would be available on demand. Would doing MSCD webinars cause me to lose seminar business? I don’t think so. If you come to my seminars or invite me … Read More
