Via this post on the WSJ Blog, I learned about survey results presented by three Harvard Law School professors in an article entitled “What Courses Should Law Students Take? Harvard’s Largest Employers Weigh In.” (Available here on SSRN.)
I’m not surprised that “Contract drafting” didn’t feature in the results for the question “What courses should HLS students take?,” given that the more prestigious law schools apparently prefer, validly or not, to incorporate contract drafting into substantive courses. (See this blog post.) Harvard might not offer a separate course on contract drafting.
Just as unsurprising is that “Contract drafting” doesn’t appear in the results for the question “What skills/knowledge bases should students acquire?” That’s because “Contract drafting” didn’t feature as a possible answer. The omission shouldn’t come as a surprise, given that plenty of full-time faculty don’t know from contract drafting.
But the article notes the following:
Several other corporate associates stressed the importance of hands-on experience with contracts (M&A contracts and loan agreements) and SEC filings, writing “Also, … it could be hugely helpful … if in the context of this type of workshop or another class, you could introduce students to the actual legal documents that govern these transactions ….”
That suggests that if “Contract drafting” had been included as one of the responses, it might have made a decent showing in the results.
But bear in mind that the 124 respondents were all from BigLaw, and we all know that BigLaw doesn’t draft contracts, it regurgitates. Just joking! Sort of.