The most prevalent defense of traditional contract language is that it has been “tested” by the courts. Heck, I even encountered an ardent proponent of the notion on my recent trip to Saudi Arabia. So I wasn’t surprised to encounter this comment on LinkedIn that endorses the notion. But I was intrigued that the comment was by the general counsel … Read More
Today I noticed this post on LinkedIn by Nir Golan, a legal-tech guy based in Israel. He opens his post by saying “It is time for simple legal docs.” I assume that by “docs,” he primarily means contracts. He also says this: Instead of spending millions of dollars developing tech to help us understand complicated legal docs, why not finally … Read More
A saving grace of what I do is that I’m not trying to win a popularity contest—if you, and you, and you find value in my writings, that’s enough for me. But I can’t help but notice two kinds of people untouched by A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. First, there are know-it-alls. I might encounter a know-it-all on … Read More
It’s once again time for the ABA Journal’s annual list of the best law blogs. I noticed that Ron Friedmann’s blog Strategic Legal Technology has made the hall of fame. Congratulations, Ron. I too reside in the hall of fame, sitting on a cloud bank, wearing a white toga, with a laurel wreath around my head. But return of the ABA … Read More
You can now register for my 2018 public “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminars in the U.S. Here are the relevant links: 22 February, Dallas 22 March, New York 17 May, Chicago 14 June, Seattle 13 September, Boston 29 November, San Francisco Each participant will receive at no extra charge a copy of the fourth edition of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. I hope to see … Read More
This article in the ABA Journal contains Bryan Garner’s version of part of a particularly impenetrable consulting agreement. His focus is layout, and in his redraft he in effect offers an enumeration scheme for contracts. (The image above is the first part of it.) But it treats the constituent elements inconsistently. Consider first the subsections, using the (A) hierarchy. Subsection … Read More
Welcome back to the categories of contract language! Consider the following alternatives: Language of Discretion The Customer may purchase Widgets only by using Acme’s purchase-ordering system to submit a purchase order to Acme. Language of Obligation Used to Express a Condition To purchase Widgets, the Customer must submit purchase orders to Acme through Acme’s purchase-ordering system. Which do you prefer? … Read More
In this post I say why it’s important to be systematic about applying effective contract-drafting usages systematically. But in my consulting work, that’s only a small part of the story. If, as is usually the case, I’m charged with producing a new version of a template that uses traditional contract language, my work consists of way more than fine-tuning the … Read More
You’re in charge of contract templates at a big company. When it comes to creating and maintaining a company’s contract templates, often one has to make do. But that doesn’t apply to your company. You’re too big for that excuse to work. Besides, your company is fond of proclaiming how it strives for “excellence.” But in terms of what they … Read More
This is from the introduction to the fourth edition of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting: This manual might seem like a style guide, but it’s too lengthy and too detailed to be used by all contracts personnel in your organization. Instead, this manual would likely be appropriate for those who work extensively with contract language. But it’s suitable … Read More
