Blog

MSCD4: Too Much of a Good Thing?

The third edition of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting is 510 pages long. Today I was surprised to be told that the fourth edition will weigh in at around 700 pages. That represents a lot of new material, particularly when you take into account that I’ve omitted chapter 20 (Drafting Corporate Resolutions). There’s no padding in the fourth … Read More

Notes from the Road: Kuwait

I’m just back from Kuwait, where I did a “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar under the auspices of the Kuwait Commercial Arbitration Center and the Commercial Law Development Program of the U.S. Department of Commerce. I thank the KCAC for their hospitality, and I thank the CLDP for being imaginative enough to think that exposing Kuwaitis to yours truly would further the … Read More

Can “And/Or” Be Rehabilitated?

Thanks to Steven Sholk, I learned of an article by Ira P. Robbins, professor at American University’s Washington College of Law. The article is entitled “And/Or” and the Proper Use of Legal Language, and it will be published in the Maryland Law Review. (The SSRN page for the article is here.) Professor Robbins’s view is a contrarian one—that we should … Read More

Seminars in Chicago. And Houston. And St. Louis. And Columbus.

Next Thursday (19 May) I have a public “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar in Chicago. And on the following three Thursdays I give the same seminar in Houston, Texas; St. Louis, Missouri; and Columbus, Ohio. I hope to see some of you there. I’ve been doing these seminars for ten years because they’re a great introduction to my approach to contract … Read More

In Contract Drafting, “Grunt Work” Isn’t a Valuable Training Tool

[Update 13 May 2017: I should make it clear that I’m not suggesting that automated contract drafting is by itself enough to make one an informed drafter. Instead, my point is that comparing the two means of generating the bulk of contract text, automated contract drafting is a better vehicle for training than is copy-and-pasting. But by itself it’s not … Read More

The First Question to Ask About My Consulting Services

Even if you’re aware of what I do, I suspect you haven’t considered whether to hire me to redo your template contracts. Allow me to make that easier by breaking down for you the factors to bear in mind. Let’s think of them as questions. What’s the first question? Well, I suggest it shouldn’t be, “Can Adams improve our templates?” Unless your … Read More

MSCD as a Credential?

Here’s an email I received from a reader: I was interviewing for a new job 6 months ago and mentioned I am a big MSCD fan. The GC said “That is the most impressive thing you could have said.” Needless to say, I got the job. THANK YOU! I take two things from that. First, that MSCD is an established … Read More

Four Contract-Drafting Axioms

To coin a phrase, We hold these truths to be self-evident: It’s preferable to draft contracts consistent with a set of guidelines for contract language, as opposed to relying on conventional wisdom, improvising, or simply copying. That’s why I wrote MSCD. It’s the only such set of guidelines, and with each new edition it becomes more entrenched. I’d be surprised … Read More

What Has to Come Next

The fourth edition of A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting is now in production. That side of my work will certainly continue, but the bulk of it is done. So even though you won’t see the fourth edition for another four months, I’m already focusing on what comes next. Allow me to go out on a limb: To make … Read More

Using MSCD in Law School

At my recent “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar in Portland, Oregon, I met David Hill. Dave teaches contract drafting at the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law, so we chatted about what he does. By email, he followed up with some thoughts about how he uses A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting as part of his course: I designed … Read More