Blog

Seattle, June 23, “Automate Our Contracts? But Why? And How? A Discussion with Ken Adams”

by

Live or work in or around Seattle? Good—listen up: Starting at 4:15 p.m. on June 23, 2016, immediately after my Seattle “Drafting Clearer Contracts” seminar, Thomson Reuters Contract Express and I will be holding a free cocktail reception at the Washington Athletic Club, 1325 Sixth Avenue, Seattle, WA 97101. I’ll discuss how automation offers the most effective way to scale rigorous contract language. I’ll show you … Read More

Don’t Use Definition-First Autonomous Definitions

by

MSCD offers two ways to create defined terms: autonomous definitions and integrated definitions. Here’s an autonomous definition: “SEC” means the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Here’s an integrated definition, with its associated defined-term parenthetical: … Acme Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation (“Acme”). But one also sees a different way of presenting definitions: as autonomous definitions, but with the defined term placed at the … Read More

A Print Edition of “The Structure of M&A Contracts”? Praise Be!

by

You remember my book The Structure of M&A Contracts? Yeah, that one. It was published in 2011, ebook only, using Thomson Reuters’s Proview platform. But for reasons that I never quite understood and would rather not dwell on, buying it was a nightmare. Every month or two I would receive an email from someone who had tried to buy it … Read More

A New Taxonomy of Vagueness in Contracts

by

This contains my first attempt at expressing something I’ve been mulling over for a while—the notion of “floating vagueness.” I’m prepared for it to end up in the dustbin. [Updated 25 June 2016: Hey guess what, it did end up in the dustbin! I found a way to express more simply the concepts I was groping for. My revised analysis will … Read More

“To the Extent It Is Able to Do So”

by

Here’s an oddity: to the extent it is able to do so. (Variants include to the extent that it is able to do so, to the extent she/he is able to do so, to the extent they are able to do so, and to the extent [insert party name] is able to do so.) A search on EDGAR pulled up … Read More

“On an Ongoing Basis”

by

I’ve written about abuse of basis, as in on a timely basis. See this 2007 post. But silly me, I didn’t think of the most jargontastic variant, on an ongoing basis. Don’t ever use it. If you ever have, plead forgiveness from the gods of drafting. If you don’t believe me, here are some examples from the La Brea tar … Read More

“Periodically”

by

Friends, there’s never a good reason to include periodically in a contract. Consider language of obligation: The Bank will provide the Client periodically with a statement of account for each Account, identifying Assets held in the Accounts. If I were the client, I’d sure want to be more specific that periodically, which could mean “at regular intervals” or just “from time … Read More

“At All Times”

by

As a general matter, don’t use at all times. If you refer to a given period, if you say someone has to do something, if you say that things were a certain way, usually it follows that whatever it is applies at all times, unless you specify otherwise. Here are some unprettied-up examples from EDGAR: … at all times during … Read More

The First Rule of Traditional Contract Drafting Club

by

Behold my five-thousandth tweet: The first rule of Traditional Contract Drafting Club is: Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement to the contrary, the parties hereto ackn — Ken Adams (@AdamsDrafting) June 2, 2016 If I say so myself, I think it’s pretty funny.

The voice that matters.

Innovative scholarship. Extensive writings. Hundreds of Drafting Clearer Contracts presentations around the world. Commitment. That’s what makes Ken Adams the unmatched authority on clearer contract language.

Contact Ken

164 Brompton Road
Garden City, NY 11530-1432

(516) 318-6956

kadams@adamsdrafting.com

© 2025 Kenneth A. Adams

Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Terms of Service