The word actively can join the long list of useless—or at least mostly useless—words used on contracts. In particular, it often seems that actively is in effect used just to mean the opposite of passively. That’s redundant, given that actively is always used with a verb that connotes action. Consider the following examples from EDGAR: Liens for taxes not yet delinquent … Read More
The implications of using either or both of the phrases arising out of and relating to is a topic of perennial interest. (For example, see this post, this post, and this post.) So today an article in Corporate Counsel entitled 3 Pitfalls in Contractual Choice-of-Law Provisions (here) caught my eye. It’s by two partners and an associate at McDermott Will & … Read More
I’m gearing up for my November seminars in Seoul, Singapore, and Kuala Lumpur (more information here), and in Abu Dhabi (more information here). I’m particularly looking forward to my visit to Seoul, as it will be my first visit. I thought it appropriate to get a sense beforehand of what the contract-drafting life is like for Korean lawyers. So I … Read More
In this post and this post I explain why my approach to contract language doesn’t favor clarity over avoiding risk. There’s no plausible reason for anyone to spurn A Manual of Style for Contract Drafting. Nevertheless, inertia remains. Someone who attended one of my seminars made the following point in a LinkedIn message to me: I would love to be able … Read More
Thanks to Jeff Ammon of the Michigan law firm Miller Johnson, I learned of the Sixth Circuit’s recent opinion in Kia Motors America, Inc. v. Glassman Oldsmobile Saab Hyundai, Inc. (copy here). Kia’s dealer contract with Glassman specified that “As permitted by applicable law, [Kia] may add new dealers to, relocate dealers into or remove dealers from the [Area of Primary Responsibility] assigned to … Read More
Generally, when I disagree with someone, it’s not over some discrete usage issue. Instead, it’s because they’ve bought into one of the three great misconceptions of contract drafting. You’re already familiar with them, but since I encounter them alarmingly often, I thought I’d take this opportunity to air them again: 1. “Everyone Has Their Own Drafting Style” Just yesterday I … Read More
Having just responded to a traditionalist asserting that I’m flirting with disaster by deviating from “tested” contract language, I was pleased to receive the following email from Andrew Mitton, a lawyer in private practice in Anchorage, Alaska: I’m a faithful reader of your blog and regularly refer to your Manual of Style. I recently redrafted some stock purchase documents to … Read More
Steven Sholk, that bloodhound, let me know about an article in the current issue of the Journal of Legal Education. It’s by Robert C. Illig, associate professor at the University of Oregon School of Law, and it’s entitled A Business Lawyer’s Bibliography: Books Every Dealmaker Should Read. (Go here for a PDF copy.) Here’s its stated purpose: This article briefly surveys … Read More
Unsure whether you should be paying someone at the law firm of Preen & Strut $600 an hour to draft your contracts? Or uncertain whether a member of your in-house legal staff is doing a good job with your templates? Well, take the following quiz and all will be revealed! (In the quiz, the phrase “your guy” is gender-neutral.) A … Read More
Unsurprisingly, most of Koncision’s confidentiality-agreement template relates to, well, confidentiality. But as with any contract, there’s a fair amount of boilerplate. That makes our template a unique source for state-of-the-art boilerplate: notices provisions, governing-law provisions, forum provisions, arbitration provisions, and so on. So if you subscribe using our upgrade-your-template option (go here [link no longer available] for more on our … Read More
