Yes, it’s time to return to the shall wars. Thanks to the article by Lori Johnson that I discuss in this post, I’d now like to consider a court opinion that I overlooked when it first appeared. I’m referring to Lubbock County Water Control & Improvement Dist. v. Church & Akin, L.L.C., 442 S.W.3d 297 (Tex. 2014) (PDF here). The Court Opinion … Read More
As their principal objection to tinkering with mainstream contract language, traditionalists offer the notion of “tested” contract language—mess with the standard formulations and you invite a world of risk into your lives. My objection to that objection has been that it’s mostly offered without any backup. Usually it’s a platitude that’s invoked as a matter of expediency, to rationalize maintaining the status … Read More
Early in the modest tweetstorm caused by last Friday’s post, I saw this tweet by @JEGrant3: Here's the power of an #MVP: @avvo just got @KonciseD to consult on improving their product. For free. #leanstartup https://t.co/FNf4BrOzvA — John E. Grant (@JEGrant3) April 8, 2016 I was mystified. “MVP”? WTF? But @anseljh came to the rescue, explaining that “MVP” stands for … Read More
You might have seen last Friday’s post about Avvo Legal Forms (here). It prompted enough comment that I thought some follow-up was in order. Avvo’s Response In my post I was categorical that Avvo Legal Forms is, as I put it in the title, a real stinker. That prompted a response from Avvo’s CEO, Mark Britton, as reported by Bob … Read More
I learned from this post by Bob Ambrogi that Avvo, an online legal-services marketplace, has announced that it “has added a selection of no-cost, high-quality legal forms for family, business, estate planning and real estate to its website.” Avvo apparently expects to have more than 200 forms available by the end of 2016. With no enthusiasm, I duly completed the questionnaire for one … Read More
At one of my Geneva seminars this week, a participant told me that Czech law says you have to include certain information in the introductory clause. At my request, she followed up with a colleague, who told her the following: This is stipulated under Sec. 435 of the Czech Civil Code(act no. 89/2012 Coll.). Please see below: (1) Every entrepreneur … Read More
The other day I permitted myself the following japery on Twitter: Contemplating new "efforts" standard: premium effortssuperior effortsValhalla effortsgalactic effortsKal-El effortsEfforts McTryHard — Ken Adams (@AdamsDrafting) April 2, 2016 But that led me to search for efforts standards on steroids. Searches for the likes of major efforts uncovered nothing, unsurprisingly, but I got plenty of hits on EDGAR for one formulation—extraordinary … Read More
I’ve long been aware of the challenges of translating contracts. Heck, back in 2004 I wrote one of my first articles, this one, on that subject. And in 2014 I did this webcast with eCPD Webinars. Last year Ruth Gámez and Fernando Cuñado came to my attention. They have an active online presence, with their website and their presence on Twitter (username @traduccionjurid). … Read More
It’s time for that ever-popular game, Pick the Category of Contract Language! Bob, please tell our viewers what the choices are! Acme shall make all decisions relating to commercializing Licensed Products. [By using language of obligation, this expresses, appropriately, the idea that Widgetco wouldn’t want Acme to ignore what’s required to commercialize products. But it doesn’t express that Acme will be in … Read More
Apparently there’s no I in team. And there’s no objective and subjective in use and interpretation of efforts provisions. When I ask seminar participants to tell me the difference between best efforts and reasonable efforts, it’s routine for someone to suggest that the former represents an objective standard and the latter a subjective standard, or vice versa. That question is in … Read More
